In art and sculptures, few artist show the labia, but always the breasts.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lee
  • Start date Start date
L

Lee

Guest
Are women being short changed? There is always much details about the penis and testicles, but little about the vulva and labia. The statues in Oslo were great, except that there was little detail about the female anatomy. Are women being short changed. I love my private parts, and are proud of them. I want men to explore them, as much as I wish to expore their private parts. The female groin needs more detail, after all this is the basis of sex and where babies come from. I know most of our parts are internal, but that is what women so great.
The first answer was gross, as one could expect from a male.

But the point is that there is much more to being female then the female breasts. I am not talking about everything, that is why nature gave us hair to cover our privates. Also it is a wonder that the penis and testicles stick out, as if to say a message of fertility.

But the female genetialia is special, it is hidden by a crack, shown by the vulva, and thus artists, male and female, should respect the female form, as being special, the hidden ability to give life, such as should be respectected by all. Not a blank picture of a groin with no detail, but a slight opening, such as the vulva lips, which can then show the opening of life that only the female form can provide.
 
Idk but i think its a shame that even artists would think that a woman's labia is too shamefull to be made into art!! FYI in ancient greek times, sculptures of men often showed men's penises to be smaller than in reality because ppl generallly thought of penises as vulgar. I think that ppl need to stop thinking that mens and womans genitals are shamefull and dirty
 
Back
Top