Imagine no teabaggers

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Facts
  • Start date Start date
magellan01 said:
What does that have to do with anything?
Click to expand...
Well, the proto-teabaggers were a big part of the cheerleading squad for Bush's preemptive strike doctrine, so I don't really see how they can object to having such a doctrine applied to themselves. Unless perhaps they care to admit that they were wrong? Barring that, it's only fair to let em die by the sword they helped forge.
Of course, we'd all feel bad about it afterwards. ;)
 
Der Trihs said:
Classic right wing garbage.
Click to expand...

Well, you know how us right wingers are, ehe?

But that's what defenders of the Right always do when someone calls them on their stupidity and evil; they claim a false equality with them and their opponents.
Click to expand...

I know what you mean. They also start threads concerning their deep fantasies about death to their political opponents, and then other chime in for the circle jerk to demonize their opponents and toss around Godwin-esque statements and...

...Oh...wait!

-XT
 
ElvisL1ves said:
And a Democrat, don't leave that out. Hard to tell which is the more fundamental factor, but ISTM Obama's getting noticeably less visceral hatred than Clinton, so far. Could have something to do with general recognition that the mess we're in is a Republican creation.
Click to expand...

I don't how you get that impression. Back in Clinton's day, the right wing smear machine was still getting assembled. The internet was a mere shadow of its present self. There weren't massive anti-Clinton rallies and the Republicans weren't quite so much in lockstep opposition. I don't recall any astroturf movement in opposition to Clinton or anyone saying he wasn't one of us.
 
xtisme said:
Well, you know how us right wingers are, ehe?
Click to expand...
You are defending the Right regardless of your own position.

xtisme said:
I know what you mean. They also start threads concerning their deep fantasies about death to their political opponents, and then other chime in for the circle jerk to demonize their opponents and toss around Godwin-esque statements and...

...Oh...wait!
Click to expand...
No, they actually brandish guns or outright try to kill their opponents.
 
ElvisL1ves said:
:p Thanks for the laugh. Did you spend the 90's in an alcoholic haze or something? Not a foreigner exactly, no, but a traitor, communist, pervert, even serial murderer, oh my, yes, indeedy. You could look it up.
Click to expand...

The crazy accusations against Clinton never got the number of followers nor mainstream media attention that people like, say, birthers have gotten. Never.

The Facts said:
Conservatives ARE, by objective fact, racist, sexist, homophobic intolerant, ignorant, hateful, vile scum.
Click to expand...

Huh, I guess The Facts do have a liberal bias. :rimshot:

Zoe said:
Why would anyone support a political party based on constant lies and ignorant leadership?
Click to expand...

Fear and ignorance. They reinforce each other.

But you weren't brought up to be stupid.
Click to expand...

Yes, they were.

Measure for Measure said:
These scum dying off would not be a good thing, as they are human beings with loved ones who will miss them.
Click to expand...

Hitler had loved ones who would miss him. (Godwin'd!!!)

Rand Rover said:
Just because you are too stupid to understand the reason why the Tea Partiers hate Obama doesn't mean they don't have one.
Click to expand...

The teabaggers don't even understand why they hate Obama. They get asked what they actually do believe, or what they think should be done, and they just stare at you like deer in fucking headlights.

Stoneburg said:
I wish you were right but that is just completely untrue.
Click to expand...

So, care to make an argument there, or are you just gonna point and go, "NUH-UH"? Because if you want, we can do that back and forth all day, and in the end I'll still come away looking better, since I'm the one who started with an actual point instead of just an unsupported denial.
 
Diogenes the Cynic said:
No. So does the Klan.
Click to expand...

Not sure what a Kave Bear Kult has to do with anything but...no? What was the 'no' referring to there? That it's not ironic at all that liberals and conservatives love to bash each other in ridiculous ways? Well, irony is in the eyes of the beholder, I suppose. Or was the 'no' saying that conservatives don't do those sorts of things? Or did the 'no' mean something else? Just curious.

-XT
 
Smeghead said:
"Look, there goes a lynch mob, bent on attacking people based on the ways in which they're different from themselves!"

*Pause*

"Let's kill them!"
Click to expand...

As I expected, some stupid person ALWAYS gets the analogy wrong. Why don't you just say I'm no better than they are and that killing won't solve anything? That'll get you the trifecta of impotent reasoning

Tea Baggers are going to start killing people directly soon if they don't get their way. Their anti-health, anti-progressive, pro-religion, and pro-gun stance have already killed millions indirectly. Wishing Tea Baggers death is self-defense. I'm not at all hateful like they are. I only hate them because they pose a threat to me

For all the Tea Baggers and people who support them, consider taking your fervor down a notch. Ditch the arguments about Obama = Hitler, or government takeovers. Instead, simply confess, if you can scrape together the brain cells to make a coherent sentence, that Obama simply has different views than you, no more dangerous than somebody who doesn't share the same sports fandom, and that government has a role, sometimes a big role, especially when the previous government decided to cede their authority and responsibility to private for-profit corporations with no accountability

Then maybe you can live. Otherwise, fuck 'em all, go die
 
Would the world be better off without pedophiles? Yes. Do I want to kill all pedophiles. No, because that would be a worse crime. Agreed?

I don't equal Teabaggers (really, shouldn't that be added to the spell check by now?) with pedophiles, I just picked the worst thing that I still wouldn't want to kill. Teabaggers are more like neo-nazis to me. Actually they're pretty much exactly like neo-nazis. Retardedly ignorant angry right wing extremists with a violent streak.
 
Der Trihs said:
You are defending the Right regardless of your own position.
Click to expand...

Well, I'm certainly not going to be on YOUR side in this sort of discussion! :p

No, they actually brandish guns or outright try to kill their opponents.
Click to expand...

Seriously? I didn't know left wingers would even touch guns...

-XT
 
BobLibDem said:
I don't how you get that impression. Back in Clinton's day, the right wing smear machine was still getting assembled. The internet was a mere shadow of its present self. There weren't massive anti-Clinton rallies and the Republicans weren't quite so much in lockstep opposition. I don't recall any astroturf movement in opposition to Clinton or anyone saying he wasn't one of us.
Click to expand...
Are you saying that if he knew what was going to happen, Gore wouldn't have invented the internet?
 
Squink said:
Well, the proto-teabaggers were a big part of the cheerleading squad for Bush's preemptive strike doctrine, so I don't really see how they can object to having such a doctrine applied to themselves. Unless perhaps they care to admit that they were wrong? Barring that, it's only fair to let em die by the sword they helped forge.
Of course, we'd all feel bad about it afterwards. ;)
Click to expand...

What I've trying to determine is if you think a doctrine of pre-emption is justifiable or not? Which is it?
 
The Facts said:
So sad you have no argument. Please stay out of threads started by your intellectual betters.
Click to expand...

If one of my intellectual betters started a thread, I might. You sure as hell aren't my intellectual better, by any stretch of the imagination.
 
xtisme said:
Not sure what a Kave Bear Kult has to do with anything but...no? What was the 'no' referring to there? That it's not ironic at all that liberals and conservatives love to bash each other in ridiculous ways? Well, irony is in the eyes of the beholder, I suppose. Or was the 'no' saying that conservatives don't do those sorts of things? Or did the 'no' mean something else? Just curious.

-XT
Click to expand...
I didn'ty say conservatives were racist, I said teabaggers are. They are an extremist hysterical subset of conservatives. I would cite a liberal equivalent, but there isn't one at the moment.
 
Der Trihs said:
Since he's blatantly factually wrong, no. As I said; he's either lying or delusional, probably lying.
Click to expand...

Option 3: he disagrees with you. And you are the one that is delusional.

And I think the odds on #3 being correct are short indeed.
 
Back
Top