M
magellan01
Guest
It came from "The Facts". What more do you need?
It came from "The Facts". What more do you need?
M
magellan01
Guest
What does that have to do with anything?
A
asterion
Guest
That's when we launch the revolution. Can't be a bunch of Commies without launching the revolution.
S
Shot From Guns
Guest
Race isn't a choice. There are no intrinsic qualities to being Black or Hispanic, other than phenotypic ones. Political ideology, on the other hand, says a hell of a lot about you as a person.
I'd celebrate living in a country where even people who are dead-fucking-wrong have the right to think what they want, and I'd defend their right to think it.
Now you're getting into the territory of advocating illegal action, which is wrong (and illegal).
OLO UR NOT TLOLERANT B/C U DON'T TOLERATE MAI INTOLERENS!!!!!111!11 i caut u!!!!!111
Fucking retard.
1.) I highly doubt there are 50 million teabaggers.
2.) Yeah, I'd be cool with that. Of course, I also wish death on the guy who pulls up into the crosswalk at the intersection, and the woman in the elevator who drenched herself in perfume.
The old bitch was fine with thousands of children starving to death instead of getting their parents on birth control, wasn't she?
The President is near?!
Joke's on us all--Starving Artist is really Obama.
C
crowmanyclouds
Guest
T
The Facts
Guest
Once again, we have the "all god's children" rhetoric. Yes, yes, their children love them ... so what? Morality consists of doing the most good for the greatest amount of people. The teabag virus would be sad for a few people, maybe ... but would leave an infinietely better place for the rest. Nobody in the discussion, including you, denies this.
D
Der Trihs
Guest
Classic right wing garbage. "Oh, they say the same thing about you too" doesn't make them correct. But that's what defenders of the Right always do when someone calls them on their stupidity and evil; they claim a false equality with them and their opponents.It's ironic that they say similar things about Liberals, no? And in similar over the top ways too. Well...it's ironic to ME, anyway.
B
BobLibDem
Guest
No, dadburnit! The president is a n- DONNNNNNGGGGG!
M
Measure for Measure
Guest
Some sort of terrorist action. This past week a right wing loony got into a gunfight with some Oakland cops. Cool heads and professionalism prevailed at the Oakland PD and only the body armored perp was hurt, but not killed.
Reportedly the conservative bank robber was planning on taking down the ACLU and Tides Foundation. When you have hot headed conservative lunatics calling for violence on the radio (with a thin veil of course) some sensitive souls are liable to act on it. The same would apply to sociopathic posts like the OP, except they don't have anywhere near the same reach.
You know who called for mass murder? Godwin.
Curse you Shot From Guns for beating me too the punch!Shot From Guns said:
Actually this is more Stalinist (10 million dead) than Naziist (6? million Jews). I find it hard to see how veiled calls for mass murder are consistent with any moral system, never mind utilitarianism. You are depraved.The Fear said:
T
The Facts
Guest
This is the debate I asked for in the OP -- yes, I'm sure some of them are doctors or teachers or other socially-productive people, and THEY have a net soicial benefit, even aside from their evil politics. But are there enough of those people in the group to outwiegh the socially-useless ones. I think not, but I'd like an argument.
So far, nobody has one. People are unwilling to follow through with their logic. They know conservatives are bastards that drag society down, but when someone asks, even in idle way, if we wouldn't be better off without them ... which should be OBVIOUS ... everyone gets all "oh no, every sperm is sacred, every human life is valuable" shit.
M
Measure for Measure
Guest
Reverend Falwell distributed videos that accused Clinton of murder (google Vince Foster). Read the Wallace literature from the 1960s for more examples of right-wing paranoia.
Conservatives go ape-shit whenever a Democrat is elected President. That the case against Obama is less than threadbare doesn't really matter -- this is a matter of political psychology. In 2008, I thought that the swamps would be even crazier if Hillary was elected Prez: now I am not so sure. Obama is a clean cut guy, IMHO: their attacks provide us with insight into modern conservative personality defects. Thankfully, the left doesn't have so much of this: I'd argue that the OP is more an exception than the rule.
M
Measure for Measure
Guest
Bush co liked pre-emptive strikes though they violated age-old rules of war -- not that it matters to the modern conservative.
The wider point is that the OP is embedded in the crazy.
T
The Facts
Guest
So sad you have no argument. Please stay out of threads started by your intellectual betters.
M
magellan01
Guest
"Kind of"?!
T
The Facts
Guest
And yet, you have no argument.
E
ElvisL1ves
Guest
And a Democrat, don't leave that out. Hard to tell which is the more fundamental factor, but ISTM Obama's getting noticeably less visceral hatred than Clinton, so far. Could have something to do with general recognition that the mess we're in is a Republican creation.
D
Diogenes the Cynic
Guest
No. So does the Klan.
T
The Facts
Guest
When evil is armed, words aren't enough.
G
Gyrate
Guest
Oh my God - a talking douche! A talking douche who has managed to get me onto the same side of an argument as Clothahump! Inconceivable!
Wishing for the deaths of people you don't agree with is not a sign of intellectual superiority. Thinking that it is, is even less so.
For the last fucking time, that movie was not made by American liberals, American conservatives, or anybody American. It is the false equivalence of false equivalences to drag a foreign-made movie into a discussion about the Tea Party assaults on a sitting American President.