if your state was to make it mandatory for welfare recipients to be drug tested?

  • Thread starter Thread starter slavior_jesus
  • Start date Start date
would you be for it or against it and y? i am for it cause if your going to be taking my money that i made working, it better not be used for drugs.
you see i have to be drug tested once a year, randomly. now if i do y do other people not have to. i have nothing against testing cops and GOV workers. they should be setting an exaple. Sir i beilive you have your parties mixed up conservatives generally want lower taxes and less spending, libs want to tax and spend. look at New York lib tax and spending really works.
some of you r right i didn't think of the kids at first, but still if the parents are on drugs how much are they spending on there kids? are they really trying to help their kids?
 
I'd be for it. Companies test people for drugs all the time and it isn't as expensive as many people think. With each positive test result we could cut thousands of dollars from the welfare budgets and weed out those who choose not to help themselves.
 
If drug test are needed they will be administered and the subsidies that you receive are now under review. The wheel that squeak will be greased. This is america and just because leadership is loaded with a better vision as in most cases the elite (if any) will pay more or they will leave this country. The choice have been made before. My own quote, " It's a tuff titty but you got to suck it anyway ".
 
Back
Top