if we are made in gods image, does that mean god is not perfect?? so how can he...

  • Thread starter Thread starter chuloxxx
  • Start date Start date
C

chuloxxx

Guest
...expect us to be?
please don't insult the apes!!!
please don't insult the apes!!!
please don't insult the apes!!!
 
God's image does not have to be perfect. A photograph, painting or video will only record some aspects of you, but it is still your image.
We are the image of God, but we are not infinite, all knowing or all powerful as He is.

EDIT: The Holy Spirit is perfect. It is His job to perfect the people He inhabits (i.e., Christians). He does so to the extent Christians permit Him to.
 
@Nero's Shrink: How do you know that God/Jesus is all that exists? Isn't that the same type of circular logic? There might as well be a purple unicorn with puppet strings tied to their backs as the unicorn came to me in a dream last night
 
God doesn't want us to be perfect.God wants us to be whole.
I'm assuming you got the whole perfect thing from the KJV bible and it is a big misconception. Just like God hating gays and interacial relationships.
I have been doing a lot of research about the origin of the Christan bible. And from what I can tell it was originally written in Peshitta, and the bible we read today is filled with a lot of concepts that came to be because of words getting lost in translation.

Firstly according to the Aramaic translations I have read God made us in his "visage" or vision. This word over the years has come to mean image.
Meaning God made us to look how he wanted,not necessarily like himself.
It's just like a painter makes a picture of a person.
The portrait will more than likely come out in his "visage" or vision and not in his image meaning looking like himself.
Secondly in many of the Aramaic translations it says God wants us to be "complete" or whole.However over the years many translators used the word "perfect" as a synonym and thus causes the scripture to have different meaning.

So there is my answer.Interpret it as you will. If you feel the need to check my answer you can start by looking up the origin of the Christian bible or Peshitta.

Peace and Blessings!
 
...what "god" are you referring to....?

The God (YHVH) of Creation...(El Shaddi, Ha Shem, Adonai) Created "everything" in absolute perfection... "then" He turned it over to mankind to manage... (check out your management skills) God does NOT expect perfection... He expects "obedience" that is tempered with His Grace...Amazing Grace !
 
We are made in God's image (ie similar) and called to grow into Gods likeness (ie become like God). Jesus actually quotes Jewish scripture saying we are gods!
 
Evolutionists begin with the presuppostion that matter, the universe, and all its governing laws are the only things that exist. This is at its most base, intellectually dishonest. At its most grand, a prime example of circular reasoning.

How can I assert the universe is all there is, if in fact, I've never been outside the universe? To put it another way, how can I know I'm in a box, unless I first step outside the box?

To use an analogy you might enjoy, consider this. Nero had no way of knowing he was in the Matrix, until he first emerged from the Matrix. He had no way of knowing there even WAS a Matrix, until he first emerged from the Matrix.

Evolutionists attempt to use their mind (a product of evolution) to evidence evolution. This is akin to saying the Matrix is all there is, because I who live in the Matrix, use the Matrix to prove the Matrix is all there is. Again, this is not only illogical, it is self defeating as well as intellectually repugnant.

Shall I trust my meticulous observation? I cannot, for my meticulous observation is a product of my mind. Scientific enquiry? Again, product of my mind. Theoritical reasoning? Product of my mind. Any effort at using my mind to measure my mind is a product of circular reasoning, for any argument to check the validity of another argument is itself an argument that might be wrong.

All of Nero's meticulous observations, his scientific enquiry, his theoretical reasonings, and even his belief that his universe was all there was, told him nothing about the truth of his universe. How could it, for he was using the very thing he was seeking to understand. For all he knew, the universe could have been nothing more than a dream. Imagine the horror. A man attempting to use his dream to understand his dream.

How did he discover the truth then? Ultimately of course, by stepping outside the Matrix. But the only way he could do this… was after someone from the outside first stepped in.

…after someone from outside first stepped in…

Two-thousand years ago, a man by the name of Jesus Christ spent a number of years making certain claims about himself, about this universe, and about both you and I. He stated in no uncertain terms that he was God. He forgave people who did others harm. Others! Not wrong done to himself, but wrong done to others. He referred to himself as the I am. Not a I will be, nor a I was, but the I am. This was a Jewish way of saying that he claimed he is at every moment now and forever, present to everyone who has ever lived, is living, or ever will live.

In addition to this, he performed a variety of miracles that boggle the imagination. Judaism unwittingly acknowledges these miracles to this day by referring to him as a sorcerer. He was no sorcerer of course, but a great many of his miracles are unparalled all the same. All this however, was only the prelude. He had not yet offered the blue pill.

The blue pill came in this. He stated that he would be executed, and that his execution would be the means by which humanity could be restored into a place of proper relationship with him. He was indeed executed, and in particular, for making the claim he was God. Three days later however, he demonstrated the truthfulness of his claim by doing what scientific observation says is impossible. Namely, he overcame death.

Jesus Christ rose from the dead, having overcome death, never to die again. This act, something we Christians call the resurrection, was a historical event attested to by the eyewitness accounts of more than five-hundred credible people. (Credible, in that their accuracy concerning all other moments of their history are impeccable. Why then should the resurrection be any different?)

To use another analogy, how do we know Abraham Lincoln gave the Gettysburg Address? We have no photographs of the moment, no film, nor even the actual speech itself written in Lincoln's own handwriting. What we do have, the only thing we have in fact, are the testimonial accounts of credible witnesses. Reporters, correspondants and even members of the public, to name a few.

I wouldn't want you to think Christians don't use their minds however. That's ridiculous. Of course Christians use their mind. But Christians live first and foremost by revelation. We are those you can say, who have swallowed the blue pill. We use our minds indeed, and a great many more than you realize in various scientific fields, but only to gather what the Great Mind from outside has revealed. We walk about and interact with those who live in this world (the Matrix), but we are ultimately not of the Matrix. We are those who have been awakened. We know there is a God, for we interact with Him in our spirit.

Evolutionists on the other hand, starting with their own minds, set out using the methods of their own minds, to prove that their own minds are the only minds that exist. This
 
Back
Top