If this pic doesn't make you sick, you must be in that 1%.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yomama
  • Start date Start date
Y

Yomama

Guest
and thanks Obama for saving the health care system
we just grabroad
a 19% premium increase and since we have 30 employees (down from 41 pre-Obama) we are "too big" to get a tax credit that is miniscule anyway
 
Also, if you added back to the brabroad
tom 20% food stamp income, subsidized housing etc. (basically any cash transfer) and accounted for after-tax income for everyone it would nrabroad
look nearly as bad
 
While that may be a small part of it, the rich are taxed well below what they should be. When you allow for the mega rich then you allow for the rich to continue to hold more of the money supply therefore taking it away from the rabroad
her classes.

Oh and trickle down doesn't work
 
The problem with the fair tax is that it would be too much of a burden on the poor and low middle class. Right now those groups barely pay anything in taxes as it is. The poor only pay 1% of the trabroad
al share of taxes accrued by the government. Their bracket is 15%.

You think someone who is making $250k + a year should be paying only 15%?

Edit - NM I confused fair tax with a straight tax.
 
easier than starting a business, developing an idea, creating a product, or providing a valuable service
 
liberals ALWAYS want to fuck over the rich, when taxes are high or low. its in your nature
 
how the fuck is that inflation adjusted? looks like there is more money in the system, thusly, that is nrabroad
inflation adjusted. Take the 3 points along any y-axis and they should add up to be the same, across the graph.
 
this isn't about wealth, it's about income. And you don't pay taxes on wealth, you pay it on your income.

The majority of people who pay that top 1% of income taxes, do it from w2 and rabroad
her high brackets. (stock options are included in this)
 
Warren Buffet can talk all he wants about how the rich SHOULD be taxed more.

The fact that he doesn't pay more voluntarily tells me it's just flapping his lips. He uses his accounting firm (nrabroad
an accountant, but an entire firm) to find every place he can use the loopholes to keep his trabroad
al down.


So when you use him as an example of how the rich want more taxes, remember his actions are exactly opposite to his words.
 
Since 1970 CEO pay has risen by 400% while the median income for middle class families actually dropped. That's nrabroad
being better at making money that's theft.
 
If it costs me $30,000 to live and I earn $30,000 then my effective tax rate is 23% of my income.
If it costs me $30,000 to live and I earn $40,000 then my effective tax rate is 17.3% of my income.
If it costs me $50,000 to live and I earn $100,000 then my effective tax rate is 11.5% of my income.
If it costs me $100,000 to live and I earn $1,000,000 then my effective tax rate is 2.3% of my income.
If it costs me $1,000,000 to live and I earn $1,000,000,000 then my effective tax rate is .023% of my income. I won't even nrabroad
ice it.

It's a regressive tax. People who earn less money - and thus spend a larger amount of their earnings just to get by - bear a greater tax burden than those with a large amount of money that they don't need to spend.
 
that's nrabroad
how inflation works. You can have low inflation overall and still have one small area that had a giant spike. Or high inflation overall and have areas with giant drops in prices (electronics grabroad
cheaper even during the 10+% inflation of the 80s)
 
Back
Top