S specal k New member May 4, 2009 #1 the liberal media would have had a field day with this type of story 2 years ago. or even last year i know tea parties have been held in years past
the liberal media would have had a field day with this type of story 2 years ago. or even last year i know tea parties have been held in years past
S Steven New member May 4, 2009 #2 Every time they try to show pictures of tea bagging Republicans, the editors say "That's not fit to print!"
Every time they try to show pictures of tea bagging Republicans, the editors say "That's not fit to print!"
D deacon666smirk New member May 4, 2009 #3 Every time they try to show pictures of tea bagging Republicans, the editors say "That's not fit to print!"
Every time they try to show pictures of tea bagging Republicans, the editors say "That's not fit to print!"
S Steven New member May 4, 2009 #4 Every time they try to show pictures of tea bagging Republicans, the editors say "That's not fit to print!"
Every time they try to show pictures of tea bagging Republicans, the editors say "That's not fit to print!"
M mrjonessr41 New member May 4, 2009 #6 I'll take the 2 pts but teabaggers are a Joke and I really don't want to give them any attention.
J Joan S New member May 4, 2009 #7 Because they never drew enough people to talk about. The GOP co opted a Libertarian Party idea and used FOX to spread the word. Big difference.
Because they never drew enough people to talk about. The GOP co opted a Libertarian Party idea and used FOX to spread the word. Big difference.
I Insidious New member May 4, 2009 #8 Because the Tea Baggers weren't protesting what they said they were protesting. Spending was through the roof two years ago and taxes were the same. they're pissed off as hell that a black man was elected President.
Because the Tea Baggers weren't protesting what they said they were protesting. Spending was through the roof two years ago and taxes were the same. they're pissed off as hell that a black man was elected President.
I Incarcerated Bert New member May 4, 2009 #9 Back them they had more purpose. The last one was basically cons protesting tax brackets they will never see even in passing.
Back them they had more purpose. The last one was basically cons protesting tax brackets they will never see even in passing.