If raised in a culture, teaching that the world was created by a Great Horned

  • Thread starter Thread starter M (Sarcophilus harrisii)
  • Start date Start date
M

M (Sarcophilus harrisii)

Guest
Toad, what are the odds...? ...you'd accept this explanation as truth?
LHOOQ: I'm jes' saaayin'
Uh Yeah!: Always a comfort when the discourse is elevated.
simple: lol! maybe?
Cliff: Hypotheticals establish no bounds for acceptable responses. All responses are fitting by their nature.
 
I doubt that culture could promise that that Toad's spirit would change my life and even so I doubt I'd feel it....I also doubt that the toad would come down as a man and change the world let alone and empire performing recorded miracles and rising from the dead and I wonder if that toad has a 44 plus authorshipped record over two centuries detailing its works
 
It would have to be a mighty big Great Horned Toad - that talks!
Then I would be really, really impressed......until then, I will accept no substitutes!
 
Natural Philosophy = Philosophy based on laws determined by philosophy.

Natural Science - Philosophy that passes the scientific method but usually gets disproven eventually anyway.

Whether you are a natural philosopher like charles darwin, or an equally philosophical natural scientist, you have no claim to any truth unless you get it from God. There is no truth except that which comes from Him.

Any scientific fact is only a scientific fact until new philosophies (evidence) are discovered (or crafted) that disproves it.

And any scientific experiment intended to conclusively determine any absolute truths, would have to require every single factor in the universe (an infinite amount) to be present, and the person doing the experiment would have to have infinite knowledge of every single factor from the infinitely smallest to the infinitelety largest. And with that knowledge, you would be able to determine an absolute truth. But modern science is no where near that. So all they do is guess using philosophies to try to understand life which are comstantly replaced with new and equally ignorant philosphies on a daily basis without coming at all closer to attaining absolute truth. Man lacks the capacity to determine absolute knowledge of all things in existance. We can't even remember 10,000 phone numbers much less complete knowledge of even 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,0...
things in the universe which is actually infinately less then infinity.

For example to make any absolute statement in truth about molecules you would have to have complete knowledge and understanding of not just 1 but every molecule in existance. And we lack that capacity. So complete knowledge of every molecule, atom, and quark, are just the beginning. We'd have to know everything else also. And that is not likely to happen through science/natural philosophy.

The Correct Way to go about it is to ask The One who made everything in existance, the one who keeps the trillions of laws that govern the universe not just every second, or every billionth of a second, or even a trillionth of a second, but the one who keeps the universe running constantly even to the innfinately smallest fraction of a second.

Still not convinced? Lets examine the odds that every law in the universe would remain constant even for 2 trillionths of a second. being that there are over 100 trillion laws in place we'll say just 1,000 laws governing the universe to make this more relative. So here are the odds.

for every .000000000001/second you will have to guess the correct random number between 1 and 1,000 and get the correct number every time.

in other words.

.000000000001
"Quick roll the 1,000 sided dice and hope it lands on 1, wow it landed on 1! Let's hope it does it again!"

.000000000002
"Quick roll the 1,000 sided dice and hope it lands on 1, wow it landed on 1! Let's hope it does it again!"

.000000000003
"Quick roll the 1,000 sided dice and hope it lands on 1, wow it landed on 1! Let's hope it does it again!"

And it would have to be correct at least a trillion times per second, and never guessing incorrectly even once.


This is the logic of the philosophers trying to support a Godless universe.
 
The great thing about fiction is that you get a new wave of it every generation, and the old stuff mercifully goes away. The "toad" thing would last about long enough for 20 questions to drop it to page 2.
 
Back
Top