If micro-evolutionary science has been proven time and again...How do

J

Jamie

New member
creationists dispute macro-evolution.? Science has proven that micro-evolutionary science is fact. For example, the peppered moth. Creationists have accepted this, but still dispute macro-evolutionary science. I do not quite understand. In the example of the peppered moth ( for those who do not know, a moth that adapted its colour pattern after its natural habitat was polluted by the industrial revolution.), The moth's lifespan may seem micro to us, but to them it is eternity. This is the same for a good portion of life on earth.

Is the arguement that evolution is limited only to what a human being has been around to witness?
 
No evidence of a species evolving into another species. The fossil record has yet to show a transitional species that is not heavily debated. Adaptation(micro-evolution) I have no problem with. Adaptation shows how a species is preserved overall, not changed into another species.
 
Back
Top