giraffefan
New member
Pete C. wrote:
It's not at all an oxymoron; if you build more low-density suburbs
than there is demand for, you have overbuilt, and that is what
has happened.
That's absurd.
The typical lot size is 0.1 acre in Berkeley, 0.0625 acre in
San Francisco, and 0.05 acre in Brooklyn. One-acre lots
are not remotely "urban".
And yes, us productive blue-zone urbnaites are propping up the carbon
criminals in the burbs... something you folks should consider before
de-funding Amtrak, as we need it to get to work to support you guys.
Steve
It's not at all an oxymoron; if you build more low-density suburbs
than there is demand for, you have overbuilt, and that is what
has happened.
That's absurd.
The typical lot size is 0.1 acre in Berkeley, 0.0625 acre in
San Francisco, and 0.05 acre in Brooklyn. One-acre lots
are not remotely "urban".
And yes, us productive blue-zone urbnaites are propping up the carbon
criminals in the burbs... something you folks should consider before
de-funding Amtrak, as we need it to get to work to support you guys.
Steve