I just realized I have a good litmus test for if a poster is worth my time...

i wasn't sure whether to classify pubic lice as mongoloid librarian or librarian pedophile. the mongoloid librarians are of the morgan friedman school, but the pedophiles are of the hamiltonian school.

i'm sure there are more mongoloid librarians around here too, but i just don't know who they are. they blend in well with the socialists because of my randroid goggles.
 
Well I'll name a couple

Myself
Tom
Mover
Emfuser
Baker

And I have seen just about everyone mouth extreme republican stances such as gays rights, stuiped wars, religious influence , and more

That list would include quite a bit of people

. Having said that I recently saw DV rail against 7C which I was impressed with and Billy comes across the isle from time to time.

This AE of yours however trolls the shit out of this forums and I would put it in the useless category
 
If someone is a consistent Marxist, they're a partisan.

I've never seen someone argue before that consistency to an ideology was the same thing as partisanship.
 
Oh yes. "I HATE GOVERNMENT INTERFERING IN THE MARKET .... OH HEY, THESE FEW COMPANIES ASKED ME TO GET THEM MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES."

Completely consistent.
 
I'm sure there are limits to everything, so no "no matter what they do". I'm pretty sure that, were Obama to start publicly murdering children that even seventh circle would distance himself or if G.W. Bush were to marry a dude that even Anti-Liberal would drop his support. There are limits.

I am curious though, do you not notice the posters here who simply default to the position of their political party of choice on nearly every single issue? The people who offer little thought out or reasoned opinion, but who are usually quick to offer vehement, though superficial defense of their party's position?

Do you not notice that?

How about the idiots who can't make three posts in a thread without calling someone a libtard or conservaderp? What the FUCK are those people contributing?
 
No, it doesn't. You obviously don't know what free market means.

I buy my car insurance on the free market. I can pick and choose who I want to buy it from and they are free to quote me a price and compete on the open market. It's still VERY heavily regulated.

You don't understand what free market means and what it means for a market to be regulated and not regulated. A perfect example would be the New York Stock Exchange. Shares are bought and sold on the open market. They are still subject to regulation, ie The Securites and Exchange Act.
 
Karen, you missed the point in your emfuser rant. The libertarians here stick with their principles - the very opposite of partisanship. Partisans have no principle. They only support their party, regardless of what that party does.
 
Back
Top