Big Demon God
New member
...what your thoughts are? In what I am about to present will more or less reconcile both the belief for the existence and non-existence of the entity of what we generally reference as GOD. What are your thoughts after reading this? Please forgive it being so long but it is necessary to drive home the theory I have formulated that allows me to both believe and yet not believe in GOD and I guess it could be called A-theology and would render me as an A-theologist as a reconciliation between Atheism and Theism.
I believe in God, but not the God of so many others. I believe in the Supreme God as is represented in the A-Theology here. However I do not consider my beliefs irrational but based on Theoretical Scientific deductions much as in the case of such as Spinoza but not Spinoza’s God. I believe in the possibility of a Supreme God, who reveals himself in the harmony of all realities, even those we cannot perceive and not in a lesser god who concerns himself with the fate and actions of men or women as in the case of “revealed religions.”
In this I am to a factor on a similar page though not the same page as with Albert Einstein who aside from many claims, was not himself an Atheist, though certainly perhaps more accurately a Pantheist, or Panentheist, or even Pan-Deist. As I quote from him:
" I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details."
In short The Supreme God was not denied by Him, nor was this Supreme God merely a metaphor and did not simply stand for “an orderly system obeying rules that is the universe, and all that manifests within it, but rather than a random thing is to some degree an intelligent mind that created the universe, and is a clearly intelligent Supreme Genius expressed in these factors of such laws of physics, and that the universe as we can see and know from “Scientific and Observable Facts” obeys as laws and principles, and therefore is a God that is a law giver of these laws, the same being uncovered by Science. The only thing was he was not a believer in "Revealed Religions and Myths either."
Here is another quote.
A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, our perceptions of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty, which only in their most primitive forms are accessible to our minds—it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute true religiosity; in this sense and in this sense alone, I am a deeply religious man.
~Albert Einstein~
In short, He was much like the “Pagan” of his time, both Theoretical Scientist and yet Spiritually Minded. What Einstein clarifies is that he does not believe in a God who rewards and punishes humans for this or that, nor does he take positions on the Fate, or Salvation of humanity which we can all if we use our logic and reason naturally and scientifically, as well as spiritually justify.
But beyond these factors, it is where I myself do honestly break away. I do not "Need God or any God or Goddess, nor do I believe that any Need Me." What is absurd to me is the idea that Atheists preaches Science the Wonders of the Universe in more of a religious context that are far more fascinating than Revealed Religion, yet Science is “Revealed Knowledge” and this I agree with. All a Religion is truly is a Set of Beliefs based on the Understanding of the One that believes the “Knowledge of their Text (Books) and does not preclude that a religion has a Belief in a God or even an Afterlife. Be it on Faith or Science it is all based on “Belief by Personal exploration and Experience also speaks and calculates any number of endless possibilities.Even Religions can be called “The Theories of Everything, which indeed they are and those in the sciences are also seeking their own “Theory of Everything.” However, True Science in and of itself does not account for nor discount for the existence or non-existence of a God or any other being or things, and for that matter, because simply stating it, such subjects are beyond the instruments and methods of all sciences using the “Scientific Method.” Therefore Atheism and Theology are both a matter of faith and dependently both have the same amount of needed courage to be believed or disbelieved in. But is Atheism and Religion truly or justifiably incompatible aside from cultural bias, or ancestral traditions?
In addition according to the Scientific Methods of Good Science, It is not possible to prove that all possible gods could not exist, since we do not possess all possible facts. Although we do not have a complete understanding of the universe, it is possible to prove as well as disprove that certain specific gods could and could not exist, using logical arguments, reasonable deductions and True Theoretical Science without framing such under the trappings of any particular religious or philosophic
please forgive some of the typos. I was tired when I wrote this. If you would like to help edit those typos please feel free to email me the refinement.
I am sure you yourselves can contemplate the insanity which is the jello I call my brain.
Or maybe I am actually on to something. Anyone care to try the Math thing on this Theory? Yes I call it a Theory. Honestly what isn't?
I believe in God, but not the God of so many others. I believe in the Supreme God as is represented in the A-Theology here. However I do not consider my beliefs irrational but based on Theoretical Scientific deductions much as in the case of such as Spinoza but not Spinoza’s God. I believe in the possibility of a Supreme God, who reveals himself in the harmony of all realities, even those we cannot perceive and not in a lesser god who concerns himself with the fate and actions of men or women as in the case of “revealed religions.”
In this I am to a factor on a similar page though not the same page as with Albert Einstein who aside from many claims, was not himself an Atheist, though certainly perhaps more accurately a Pantheist, or Panentheist, or even Pan-Deist. As I quote from him:
" I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details."
In short The Supreme God was not denied by Him, nor was this Supreme God merely a metaphor and did not simply stand for “an orderly system obeying rules that is the universe, and all that manifests within it, but rather than a random thing is to some degree an intelligent mind that created the universe, and is a clearly intelligent Supreme Genius expressed in these factors of such laws of physics, and that the universe as we can see and know from “Scientific and Observable Facts” obeys as laws and principles, and therefore is a God that is a law giver of these laws, the same being uncovered by Science. The only thing was he was not a believer in "Revealed Religions and Myths either."
Here is another quote.
A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, our perceptions of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty, which only in their most primitive forms are accessible to our minds—it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute true religiosity; in this sense and in this sense alone, I am a deeply religious man.
~Albert Einstein~
In short, He was much like the “Pagan” of his time, both Theoretical Scientist and yet Spiritually Minded. What Einstein clarifies is that he does not believe in a God who rewards and punishes humans for this or that, nor does he take positions on the Fate, or Salvation of humanity which we can all if we use our logic and reason naturally and scientifically, as well as spiritually justify.
But beyond these factors, it is where I myself do honestly break away. I do not "Need God or any God or Goddess, nor do I believe that any Need Me." What is absurd to me is the idea that Atheists preaches Science the Wonders of the Universe in more of a religious context that are far more fascinating than Revealed Religion, yet Science is “Revealed Knowledge” and this I agree with. All a Religion is truly is a Set of Beliefs based on the Understanding of the One that believes the “Knowledge of their Text (Books) and does not preclude that a religion has a Belief in a God or even an Afterlife. Be it on Faith or Science it is all based on “Belief by Personal exploration and Experience also speaks and calculates any number of endless possibilities.Even Religions can be called “The Theories of Everything, which indeed they are and those in the sciences are also seeking their own “Theory of Everything.” However, True Science in and of itself does not account for nor discount for the existence or non-existence of a God or any other being or things, and for that matter, because simply stating it, such subjects are beyond the instruments and methods of all sciences using the “Scientific Method.” Therefore Atheism and Theology are both a matter of faith and dependently both have the same amount of needed courage to be believed or disbelieved in. But is Atheism and Religion truly or justifiably incompatible aside from cultural bias, or ancestral traditions?
In addition according to the Scientific Methods of Good Science, It is not possible to prove that all possible gods could not exist, since we do not possess all possible facts. Although we do not have a complete understanding of the universe, it is possible to prove as well as disprove that certain specific gods could and could not exist, using logical arguments, reasonable deductions and True Theoretical Science without framing such under the trappings of any particular religious or philosophic
please forgive some of the typos. I was tired when I wrote this. If you would like to help edit those typos please feel free to email me the refinement.
I am sure you yourselves can contemplate the insanity which is the jello I call my brain.
Or maybe I am actually on to something. Anyone care to try the Math thing on this Theory? Yes I call it a Theory. Honestly what isn't?