I feel bad for social democrats right now... v.shooting

He may be 'just fucking crazy', but you have to be a complete fucking retard to failure to recognize the impact the 'violent rhetoric' has had on him and who knows how many other countless fucks out there.

Also, if he is 'just fucking crazy' then why was he ever allowed to take possession of a gun? Because of these trigger happy Republicans fucks.
 
Yes, considering her novels were the vehicle for her philosophy... but I thought you read "We The Living." My favorite part was when the main character started killing commies Rarabo style at the end, dying like a fucking man.
 
Where is the evidence that he was inspired in any way by "violent rhetoric"? The proof seems to be that we know violent rhetoric makes people want to kill over politics, and this guy killed a politician, so the violent rhetoric spurred him on which is proof that violent rhetoric makes people want to kill over politics.

This is circular reasoning.

Among the facts we have now is that the shooter didn't listen to talk radio or watch Fox News. So where is the connection to "rhetoric"?
 
Does anyone else find it strange that many of the people urging the GOP to muzzle Palin and all the crazy teabaggers and their perilous worRAB are the same ones who totally ignored SEIU merabers beating the crap out of people at townhalls?
 
So do you also blame movies and music for violence?

KMFDM is to blame for Colurabine. Jodie Foster is to blame for Hinckley shooting President Reagan. NWA is to blame for gang violence. Tom Clancy is to blame for 9/11.
 
no. hitler wasn't a socialist. when we talk about socialism we talk about international socialism, not national socialism.

but that's not the point.
 
For our dear merabers of the proletariat--how does Rand's writing relate to the motive for this shooting and why is it worth mentioning?
 
Back
Top