Hypothitical: People on welfare should not be able to vote.....

"If I get off dis welfare dey gonna be sending me bills, so I'm just gonna stay on welfare since they can't make me pay it back while I'm still on it!"

That was pretty easy to figure out.
 
So giving them something for free without ever expecting any kind of repayment is perfectly alright? How the hell do you think drug dealers get so many people addicted? First one's free.

They can have skin in the game when they stop taking skin from their fellow man w/o repayment.

If nothing else, welfare neeRAB to be reformed where you are put in a higher tax bracket until you pay off the "loan" you were given by the people, after you are off welfare, or do public service to deserve it. Something neeRAB to be given. You cannot have a one sided equation.
 
He didn't even say abolish welfare. He said put a limit on it, and even offered a hypothetical TWO YEARS. How long do these "hard times" last before it's just a matter of not giving a shit?
 
Unfortunately, there are far too many idiots in this forum that will just turn this into a fight over stupid shit or are looking to find a way to introduce the democrat/republican or liberal/conservative dichotomy into the argument and turn it into the usual that brings.
 
you can continue to fucking talk to me that way if you like behind the anonymity of the internet, you cockgobbling featherweight. just know that you should thank your lucky fucking stars that i'm not within a 10 mile radius of you, because i would gladly visit you right now and slap you in the face with a fucking sledgehammer.
 
I think a year or two should be fine.

I love the idea of people dependent on the government not being able to vote, though. I've mentioned it several times here before.
 
Back
Top