Melissa Baker
New member
Fannie Mae was supposed to improve access and affordability of mortgages for those who otherwise "could not afford" mortgages on the terms of free markets. The terms like 20% down and 35% max payment share of income.
Instead Fannie Mae destroyed all other competition, grabbed over 50% of the market to the tune of $5 trillion, cost the taxpayers $250 billion already and counting, as well as caused economic collapse worst wince WWII and also the very same people who were supposed to benefit instead lost their homes and money too.
Why should health care insurance public option be any different?
Instead Fannie Mae destroyed all other competition, grabbed over 50% of the market to the tune of $5 trillion, cost the taxpayers $250 billion already and counting, as well as caused economic collapse worst wince WWII and also the very same people who were supposed to benefit instead lost their homes and money too.
Why should health care insurance public option be any different?