V
vishal_kamath_2007
Guest
There are two sides to the issue.
1.a) Make an argument for your side of the issue.
b) Create two assumptions that you assume to be true ( these assumptions should also not be presented in the argument )
2. a)Make an argument for your opponents side of the issue ( be fair make the strongest argument you can in their favor just like you did for your side)
b) Again make two assumptions for your opponents argument
3. Now that you have two arguments, look at the plausibility of each arguments set of assumptions against each other.
Result:
The argument that has more plausible assumptions wheter it is in your favor or not concludes the argument and you either concede or take pride in the fact that you have just learned how " real arguments are made" and how real debates are held.
Name-calling and telling someone else is wrong will get you no-where.
Thanks for reading
1.a) Make an argument for your side of the issue.
b) Create two assumptions that you assume to be true ( these assumptions should also not be presented in the argument )
2. a)Make an argument for your opponents side of the issue ( be fair make the strongest argument you can in their favor just like you did for your side)
b) Again make two assumptions for your opponents argument
3. Now that you have two arguments, look at the plausibility of each arguments set of assumptions against each other.
Result:
The argument that has more plausible assumptions wheter it is in your favor or not concludes the argument and you either concede or take pride in the fact that you have just learned how " real arguments are made" and how real debates are held.
Name-calling and telling someone else is wrong will get you no-where.
Thanks for reading