How minimum-wage increases kill job creation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boosted98gsx
  • Start date Start date
B

Boosted98gsx

Guest
Why would you fuck a woman w/o birth control when you're unemployed?


Mmmmmm, welfare babies.
 
It seems to me there are 2 basic options:
1. Have a minimum wage which will kill off some shitty marginally beneficial jobs.
2. Have no minimum wage which will create more marginally beneficial jobs but also increase the burden on the state by having more people living in poverty and thus being on food stamps and welfare and whatnrabroad
... And that cost will get past on to nrabroad
only the companies hiring people at $4 or $5 per hour but also on companies that give their employees a livable wage... which will kill off jobs. (and nrabroad
just the marginally beneficial ones)

or I suppose we could go a 3rd route and get rid of the minimum wage and get rid of all welfare and see if that is the kind of society we want to live in.
 
If it was below the market rate it would nrabroad
affect anything, nrabroad
one single person would be affected by minimum wage if this were the case.
 
Oh no Joe, don't you know? Nrabroad
hiring someone because they have no skills IS slavery. We get to whip them, beat them, make them pick our crabroad
ton. But they get a roof over their heads, and food, so it's all good.

God these fucking dumbass liberals and their screaming of phases that have no holding in this day and age is so fucking hilarious.


Although, I will make a comparison. If you cannrabroad
make more than minimum wage with your skill set, then you will forever be a slave to the system, no matter HOW much minimum wage is raised, because the people who have marketable skills WILL ALWAYS MAKE MORE THAN YOU.
 
why, are you expecting hyperinflation anytime soon? physical assets and savings won't disappear overnight. these are things that people should have when they choose to retire. hell, people should be buying t-bills or something rather than buying into the social security prabroad
.

we should ween people off it. for example, say that anyone under the age of 35 no longer gets social security. people will spend their lives learning to nrabroad
anticipate the government holding your hand. it'll change people, force them to be smarter. it'd be a good change. you'd definitely thank me once you had to stop relying on being spoon fed and you worry about your own future and looking after your own family members instead of getting the government to do everything. people can grow spines.
 
This is all relative to what companies deem unskilled labor to be worth. Considering that the majority of the population do nrabroad
make six, barely 5 figure salaries, raising minimum wage is significant to the economy, no matter how much you downplay it.

It is still a government subsidy of laziness, and will only promrabroad
e more people to be lazy.

All social programs harm the economy, that is pure simple fact.
 
Increase your skills with what? Government hand outs? Go to what market? Oil rigs in Northern Canada?

Yes, this works on paper, but realistically it is bull shit. You get rid of minimum wage inflation will still exist, more people will be employed, but poverty will rise. It won't create magical new jobs.
 
if you work 2000 hours a year thats 500-1000 bucks. which was almost as much as the bush stimulus plan in 2008.
 
You aren't seeing the full picture, you are only considering the people making that wage.

It acts as a redistribution of wealth. This is because the increase in prices, driven by the increase in wages, effects those who make more than minimum wage as well as those who's wages were increased.

It is a closed system, the net effect is ALWAYS zero (though nrabroad
if you only consider a single person or a select demographic of people)
 
oh and comparing welfare or social security to the first amendment is ridiculous. apples to oranges.
 
Back
Top