How long does it take the Free Market to put bad companies out of business?

For example, that peanut butter factory had been selling salmonella tainted peanut butter for years.

Had the government not stepped in and shut them down they'd probably still be selling it today.

In a Free Market, how much longer would would they have been allowed to go on selling tainted products?
 
In a totally free market, they would be allowed to continue selling salmonella tainted peanut butter to anyone who would buy.

Some people say that this couldn't last long, but we have ample evidence that companies selling bad products can indeed survive long term. Just look at the entire tobacco industry. Or, look at the alternative medicine industry. Both these industries generate billions in revenue each year, yet there is quite a bit of evidence that neither provide a product that is safe, or effective. (well, cigarettes are effective at keeping people addicted)
 
Not long.

It is rare that a bad company can survive and continue to business for more than a short time in a free market.

Consumers avoid bad companies like the plague.

It is extremely difficult to build up a market for your product and it is very easy to lose that market.
 
I agree that they would have kept selling it, people would eventually stopped buying it, but in the meantime, more people would have become ill or died from eating it.
 
This is the very thing that libertarian style free market types do not understand. They think is it perfectly OK to let harm happen because if it is enough harm it will stop.

They fail to grasp that a Corporation is given the power to act as a person, but there is no person that is specifically liable for it acts. (hence limited liability). On top of that a Corporation is by definition amoral (not immoral, if you do not understand the difference look it up). Their responsibility is not to society, others, their workers, the environment or even their customers. Their responsibility is only to their share holders and the bottom line. Now it is true that no corporation will last very long if they do not do the things necessary to sustain their business. But except for the government and the long arm of the law, they have no obligation to. Even a good corporation who understand these things would choose differently and cause harm from time to time if it enhanced the bottom line and they could get away with it.

Society benefits immensely from corporations and the wealth, commerce, goods and services that stem from them. So they should be allowed to exist. But is not a free ride where they have no one to answer to other than their share holders. It's all part of the deal. They can exist and make billions - but they must be responsible to the society that allows them to exist. And that means submitting to reasonable regulation and oversight.
 
Back
Top