This is a hysteria, provocative laden question. So feel free to disagree but atleast be civil.
Is absolutism regarding one time offenders, the "once an abuser or offender always an abuser or offender" the norm?
I can understand vigilance with public registries but when it borders on hysteria is when I get a bit skeptical about the rationality of some people who are too busy obsessing over shows like "To catch a Predator" where the threshold of vigilance and hysteria are basically sensationalized into a blur of pseudo-awareness and obsession kicks in.
Obviously after doing their time the offender or abuser has to want to get treatment ie anger management sessions, etc. But the general public doesn't really care about that..they want boogiemen and pariahs to lash out at.
So here's the real kicker...
When does the public reinforcement of the label and the continued ostracizing facilitate futility for said abuser or offender to effectively rehabilitate, that they decide that this is all they are and they commit an offense again because the general public who has access to these registries, has totalized them and made it their issue to harass them to the point where they can't re-enter society.
Or is it easier to just give these offenders and abusers a gun with a single bullet and locking the door saying "You know what to do" because of the American Public's thirst for blood IE justice?
Is public access to these registries a double edged sword?
Should they really be only accessible to law enforcement?
Would hysteria and paranoia claim you if you found out one of these types of people were living in your vicinity?
What would you do?
NOTE: This is more of a anti-hysteria question than a ...Pro-Sex Offender, Abuser Rehabilitation question for all you folks out there who like to jump to conclusions. /wink
debate away
Don't worry Gwennie, I felt the same way writing the question trying to phrase it so I wouldn't need to bring out my vitriol umbrella.
