Judges and prosecutors in Georgia just sent a man to prison for 13 month because he had not paid child support. Even thought it was proved thought DNA testing that he did not have children at all. How can such scum still stay in office after being so disgusting. And how can the hillbilly's of Georgia allow this. Is this not the state that passed so many sex offenders laws that it was inpossible to keep them. You hillbillys deserve what you get
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
How can judges and procescuters be so discusting?
- Thread starter Jim
- Start date
whitefangz1
New member
Some states hold that being the biological parent is not the sole factor in determining whether or not child support is due. In many states, if you legally become the father of the children through marriage or adoption, you are responsible for the children. Some states also have laws stating that if you voluntarily take on the role of parent to a child, you can not voluntarily abandon that obligation at will.
This is weird. how do they get away with it? Hope the guy appeals. where's the real daddy?
But there again there are laws that say if you're married to someone and they have a kid from someone else you're the dad on record. It's an old law in the old days it made sure the kid wasn't called names. like the b word.
But there again there are laws that say if you're married to someone and they have a kid from someone else you're the dad on record. It's an old law in the old days it made sure the kid wasn't called names. like the b word.
eastchic2001
New member
Well, it's really hard to judge considered you didn't give all of the facts. Was he the presumed father before the DNA testing was done? And had he been ordered by the court to pay child support? I'm going to assume, for purposes of this answer, that the answer to both of those questions is yes.
If so, then he was imprisoned for violating a court order. It is irrelevant whether later DNA tests proved that he wasn't the father. Child support is meant to protect the child (it's best interests). So, for example, if a woman gives birth while she is married, then in the eyes of the court the husband is the presumed father. If they get divorced, the court will order child support. Failure to pay is a violation of the court order and is punishable by imprisonment. It may have been proved that he wasn't indeed to father, but that doesn't negate the fact that he violated a court order.
Yes, I think it stinks and it is unfair. But you have to consider that the judge and prosecutor were following the law. That doesn't make them bad people, just means they might have not exercised their discretion appropriately.
If so, then he was imprisoned for violating a court order. It is irrelevant whether later DNA tests proved that he wasn't the father. Child support is meant to protect the child (it's best interests). So, for example, if a woman gives birth while she is married, then in the eyes of the court the husband is the presumed father. If they get divorced, the court will order child support. Failure to pay is a violation of the court order and is punishable by imprisonment. It may have been proved that he wasn't indeed to father, but that doesn't negate the fact that he violated a court order.
Yes, I think it stinks and it is unfair. But you have to consider that the judge and prosecutor were following the law. That doesn't make them bad people, just means they might have not exercised their discretion appropriately.