PICTISH king Cait
New member
the lands they conquered.? those lands were in Canaan hence israel.
its on an egyptian Steele fo all to see.
no Evidence of hebrew slaves.
hyksos invaders maybe.
The primary Source of the Hyksos story is Josephus.
He is also the one who applies it to the Hebrews.
did you check out my other questions.
No.
Your version of History is confused.
its just the way i put it.
i understand the differance between hyksos and sea peoples.
im impliing hebrew evidance is likley hyksos.
early isreal was sea people terriotry.
who knows who they were. a conglomorate
it had little relevance to R&S.
the origins of theistic religion have nothing to do with R+S lol
maybe you should spend more time readind what im trying to say instead of trying to sound superior and condecending
ps im dyslecsic
i suppose you think thats funny
its on an egyptian Steele fo all to see.
no Evidence of hebrew slaves.
hyksos invaders maybe.
The primary Source of the Hyksos story is Josephus.
He is also the one who applies it to the Hebrews.
did you check out my other questions.
No.
Your version of History is confused.
its just the way i put it.
i understand the differance between hyksos and sea peoples.
im impliing hebrew evidance is likley hyksos.
early isreal was sea people terriotry.
who knows who they were. a conglomorate
it had little relevance to R&S.
the origins of theistic religion have nothing to do with R+S lol
maybe you should spend more time readind what im trying to say instead of trying to sound superior and condecending
ps im dyslecsic
i suppose you think thats funny