you attempt the fine craft of offering opinions?...I mean, if you can not stretch your mind enough to interpret the writers words, or if you speed read through once and the obvious doesn't pummel you, does that mean the writers should hold your hand through it, or possibly some patience and effort to learn about reading the written words could be entertained on your part?
.
fair enough...there are no rules, first off...
secondly, I have explained several of my pieces openly and in direct e mails to you....not once have you followed up to comment or offer a notion of appreciation for my efforts to help you enjoy my words...
lastly, this is a very diverse forum and maybe, and I am hoping I am right here, maybe there are others that wish to delve in to the writers mind and style and find the force behind the somewhat cryptic and perhaps even obfuscatory language being used and then find the beauty and art that can exist in writing....I am not suggesting I hit that too often....but....even a broken watch is right twice a day...Peace, R
not even close to upset and I am targeting no one...you clicked on the Q: NJ does write and rather well...he seems to be at odds with interpreting and garnering the "purpose" of some of my writes. yet, seldom if ever has he "answered" with opinion, pro or con....mostly asking for clarity...I have tried to provide that...
now to you...should trial and error come with detailed explanations????what progress will come of that? I care for the words more than you WILL ever know....my banter and rebuttals are in hopes of guiding anyone interested toward the enjoyment and pleasure of seeing with the mind, when reading from the written word...it is art after all...and the true pleasure in appreciating any art form, requires effort...Peace, R
gee Reg...did this poor bird have only one eye? how sad...HA...pahoot....one day we will learn...
K...no I disagree..many readers are wonderful students of the written word with none or limited writing skill...but to be sure, most writers "get it" better than non writers...thanks
.
fair enough...there are no rules, first off...
secondly, I have explained several of my pieces openly and in direct e mails to you....not once have you followed up to comment or offer a notion of appreciation for my efforts to help you enjoy my words...
lastly, this is a very diverse forum and maybe, and I am hoping I am right here, maybe there are others that wish to delve in to the writers mind and style and find the force behind the somewhat cryptic and perhaps even obfuscatory language being used and then find the beauty and art that can exist in writing....I am not suggesting I hit that too often....but....even a broken watch is right twice a day...Peace, R
not even close to upset and I am targeting no one...you clicked on the Q: NJ does write and rather well...he seems to be at odds with interpreting and garnering the "purpose" of some of my writes. yet, seldom if ever has he "answered" with opinion, pro or con....mostly asking for clarity...I have tried to provide that...
now to you...should trial and error come with detailed explanations????what progress will come of that? I care for the words more than you WILL ever know....my banter and rebuttals are in hopes of guiding anyone interested toward the enjoyment and pleasure of seeing with the mind, when reading from the written word...it is art after all...and the true pleasure in appreciating any art form, requires effort...Peace, R
gee Reg...did this poor bird have only one eye? how sad...HA...pahoot....one day we will learn...
K...no I disagree..many readers are wonderful students of the written word with none or limited writing skill...but to be sure, most writers "get it" better than non writers...thanks