K, I'm almost done! Wanna C? If you have any comments or would like edit the whole thing feel free to. However My Main dilemma is this....I need to reword this entirely:
In this study and hypothesis could we ask ourselves one question? Can they pinpoint the question as to where it was coming from, or even the type of animals? Then again would this only be an assumption and that research could have found a different source rather than the source such as the herd of goats just because they had the most effect from the disease or could one breed of animal be just more susceptible to this strain of disease and get blamed for the chain reaction. It is a question of research and narrowing it down to the bottom rational factors that documented scientific research that science is still unsure of.
NOW HERE IS THE WHOLE SUMMARY...
Cause and Effects of Escherichia coli on both Man and Animal
Scientific investigation proved a correlation between proximity to Farm Petting Zoos and level of outbreak frequency in the populations. These illnesses were most likely from animals giving a strain of E. coli. Young children usually have no boundaries with these said animals. Unfortunately, the long terms and close contact depleted with these animals make matters worse. The age groups in most of these cases lead scientific research to a conclusion that this type of behavior encourages the disease to spread. The likelihood that these children will put food and other various items into their mouths and pass germs on to others is a great possibility. The closer they are to the area of the surface, the harder time their immune systems have fighting off infection. The fact that younger children are more prone to this happening rather than teenagers and adults makes the study even more conclusive.
A high number of animals in an enclosed area are more likely to contract E. coli. Animals tend to have loose stools when nervous. This then is spread in unsanitary quarters. Not to mention, this can be passed on to people visiting the petting zoo. Even with proper hygienically habits being used it was still not enough in regards to the time of use or infection that may have happened prior to the use or even children’s other skin area’s. Further studies conclude that breathing manure on the ground, walking on it and even it being airborne could pass to human bodies. The exposure in capacity would worsen the overall effect.
If people were aware of these effects they might take a better protocol. In addition to taking less chances of being exposed, spending less time and making better precautions in the attentiveness of how contact to such animals would be harmful. Fomite transmission of E. coli means we the people have additional transmission. Otherwise the passing of such germs through things such as blankets, strollers, shoes and the possessions we clean these items with can pass on germs. As well as and include a chain reaction of exposing and passing these vital germs on and on.
There was a research done regarding interviews of said case respondents asking them the amount of contact that they had with the animals, length of visit and so on. Most respondents were not entirely honest about the amount of contact or could not recall. With this data the conclusion comes to the fact that most had studies with the younger children contracting E. coli. National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians (NASPHV), gave updated research information pertaining to the total sum of outbreaks reported of the petting zoo’s, fairs and animal related events. Hence take preventative steps to help insure human safety. This was a request concerning the (Compendium of Measures to Prevent Disease and Injury Associated with Animals in Public Settings, 2004.). The employed staff at such events should be trained and help to avoid any further outbreaks. It was then stated that infant children should not be permitted contact with certain animals and removed from the environment immediately along with more sanitary settings for animals as well as equipping the area with better hygienically places’ for visitors. Another measure that was taken was educating and giving public awareness about zoonotic disease and risks before going into and animal environment. The time period of interactions between animals and humans might reduce risk factors and lower the microbial burden. (Passing of E. coli) All animal related events should also make sure that food areas are opposite of the areas animals are in or around. Samples from this investigation within the environments were taken and helped in coming up with this educated hypothesis.
Patients with E. coli symptoms were stated as having the following: Diarrhea, Bloody diarrhea, Constipation and other symptoms as well. This research was not only based on the amount or duration of visits with animals or contact but was also thought of as food contact, number of cases in the same area, age, dates of
In this study and hypothesis could we ask ourselves one question? Can they pinpoint the question as to where it was coming from, or even the type of animals? Then again would this only be an assumption and that research could have found a different source rather than the source such as the herd of goats just because they had the most effect from the disease or could one breed of animal be just more susceptible to this strain of disease and get blamed for the chain reaction. It is a question of research and narrowing it down to the bottom rational factors that documented scientific research that science is still unsure of.
NOW HERE IS THE WHOLE SUMMARY...
Cause and Effects of Escherichia coli on both Man and Animal
Scientific investigation proved a correlation between proximity to Farm Petting Zoos and level of outbreak frequency in the populations. These illnesses were most likely from animals giving a strain of E. coli. Young children usually have no boundaries with these said animals. Unfortunately, the long terms and close contact depleted with these animals make matters worse. The age groups in most of these cases lead scientific research to a conclusion that this type of behavior encourages the disease to spread. The likelihood that these children will put food and other various items into their mouths and pass germs on to others is a great possibility. The closer they are to the area of the surface, the harder time their immune systems have fighting off infection. The fact that younger children are more prone to this happening rather than teenagers and adults makes the study even more conclusive.
A high number of animals in an enclosed area are more likely to contract E. coli. Animals tend to have loose stools when nervous. This then is spread in unsanitary quarters. Not to mention, this can be passed on to people visiting the petting zoo. Even with proper hygienically habits being used it was still not enough in regards to the time of use or infection that may have happened prior to the use or even children’s other skin area’s. Further studies conclude that breathing manure on the ground, walking on it and even it being airborne could pass to human bodies. The exposure in capacity would worsen the overall effect.
If people were aware of these effects they might take a better protocol. In addition to taking less chances of being exposed, spending less time and making better precautions in the attentiveness of how contact to such animals would be harmful. Fomite transmission of E. coli means we the people have additional transmission. Otherwise the passing of such germs through things such as blankets, strollers, shoes and the possessions we clean these items with can pass on germs. As well as and include a chain reaction of exposing and passing these vital germs on and on.
There was a research done regarding interviews of said case respondents asking them the amount of contact that they had with the animals, length of visit and so on. Most respondents were not entirely honest about the amount of contact or could not recall. With this data the conclusion comes to the fact that most had studies with the younger children contracting E. coli. National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians (NASPHV), gave updated research information pertaining to the total sum of outbreaks reported of the petting zoo’s, fairs and animal related events. Hence take preventative steps to help insure human safety. This was a request concerning the (Compendium of Measures to Prevent Disease and Injury Associated with Animals in Public Settings, 2004.). The employed staff at such events should be trained and help to avoid any further outbreaks. It was then stated that infant children should not be permitted contact with certain animals and removed from the environment immediately along with more sanitary settings for animals as well as equipping the area with better hygienically places’ for visitors. Another measure that was taken was educating and giving public awareness about zoonotic disease and risks before going into and animal environment. The time period of interactions between animals and humans might reduce risk factors and lower the microbial burden. (Passing of E. coli) All animal related events should also make sure that food areas are opposite of the areas animals are in or around. Samples from this investigation within the environments were taken and helped in coming up with this educated hypothesis.
Patients with E. coli symptoms were stated as having the following: Diarrhea, Bloody diarrhea, Constipation and other symptoms as well. This research was not only based on the amount or duration of visits with animals or contact but was also thought of as food contact, number of cases in the same area, age, dates of