The federal govt has an obligation to enforce federal immigration laws but are politically held back, from political activists- democrats.
The state of Arizona created a state law only because the federal government refuses to enforce our laws.
Like capital punishment, where liberals object to any and all types of execution, directed by the court, liberals challenge the means to execute the murderer, fundamentally they disagree with the law, so challenging the means to execute is a way to filibuster and prevent enforcement of the law.
With illegal immigration, liberals created the false concern, of profiling, as a means to prevent law enforcement, from enforcing law. Although the Arizona clearly does not allow racial profiling, advocates for giving illegals amnesty, created a lie, to filibuster, to prevent law enforcement from enforcing our immigration laws. The motivation is totally political, to give illegals amnesty is motivated by the belief that a large majority of the illegals would join the democratic party, if illegals are given citizenship.
The overwhelming bias of the media, to support liberal political views (google the survey where 90% of the media admitted to prefer liberal political candidates when polled) is a factor in the prevention of government to fulfill their obligation to enforce the law. There is no outcry from the liberal media to demand enforcement of our law, while the majority of American want illegals to be deported and the borders sealed.
The strategy to attack "profiling" is an emotional device, intended to inflame racial conflict, to make enforcing laws to deport and arrest illegals for their crime, to be a form of racism. Advocates of allowing illegals to receive voting rights, rely on emotional manipulation to create a racial issue, when there is no racial issue whatsoever. The rationalization of these activists is to equate enforcing our laws, as racism. Any attempt to enforce the law, is racism.
The real underlying issue with enforcing immigration laws, is the bigger battle of socialism versus capitalism, where the socialists advocate breaking the law to add members to their party. The socialists are attracted to millions of uneducated, impoverished and unskilled workers who would become dependent on government if given citizenship.
