have you ever been approached?

C

Calista T

New member
Because it's really stupid, not because it's pedophilic. To make something such, you have to be viewing an image as one of those people, in which case any image of children can be considered such. I know thats a bad sentence but I hate typing that word.

Boab leave him alone. What you said was out of order.
 
CrabGirl said:
Do what I said and have a look at what he means.
Click to expand...

So the whole story of a horses head being turned round and looking up a wee girls skirt, which had obviously been set up for the photo to be taken, is all just fucking lies.

That's even more pathetic.
 
I agree. You crossed the line Boab. You did it when you mixed homosexuality with paedophilia, and when your bias was questioned you did it again when you lashed out and made very hurtful accusations. It is one thing to talk about ridiculous rides and such. I've been on a few and they are kind of creepy the way you sit on them, but talking about some silly ride design is a FAR cry from paedophilia.

Remember. It is best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.
 
kallieb said:
I agree. You crossed the line Boab. You did it when you mixed homosexuality with paedophilia, and when your bias was questioned you did it again when you lashed out and made very hurtful accusations. It is one thing to talk about ridiculous rides and such. I've been on a few and they are kind of creepy the way you sit on them, but talking about some silly ride design is a FAR cry from paedophilia.

Remember. It is best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.
Click to expand...

It was not Donald Duck. It was not a ride. It could have been a lion. It was a rocking type toy.
The head was covered by the wee girls skirt.
 
bigboab said:
It was not Donald Duck. It was not a ride. It could have been a lion. It was a rocking type toy.
The head was covered by the wee girls skirt.
Click to expand...

That is an absolute lie and you know it.

I'll give you your only possible out from this. That you saw such a thing posted by an account that you assumed to be me but it wasn't.

Now we know that's not true, but it is plausible.
 
kallieb said:
I agree. You crossed the line Boab. You did it when you mixed homosexuality with paedophilia, and when your bias was questioned you did it again when you lashed out and made very hurtful accusations. It is one thing to talk about ridiculous rides and such. I've been on a few and they are kind of creepy the way you sit on them, but talking about some silly ride design is a FAR cry from paedophilia.

Remember. It is best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.
Click to expand...

To be fair they are meant for wee kids.
 
Even so Boab. Paedophilia is a horrid accusation. Absolutely the worst thing you can levy at anyone, or even remotely allude to. I would never even remotely hurl that towards someone as the taboo, and disgusting nature of it all, is the worst insult possible.

We joke and poke each other, but some boundaries remain inviolate. It's best to stop.
 
Back
Top