Hasn't the no fault divorce laws harmed children and men in our society...

  • Thread starter Thread starter roughruggedraw
  • Start date Start date
R

roughruggedraw

Guest
...disproportionately? ? Statistically, 75 percent of divorces are initiated by women. With the alimony and child support laws and division of property, oftentimes, men are left having to support two households if they can. And many are left alienated from their children. And studies have shown that the long term effects of divorce on not good for the children as well and have life altering consequences. So, do you think divorce has harmed men and children moreso than women?
 
Women file for 75% of divorces for a couple of reasons. One, that women are more often left with the children and need support. They don't get it unless temporary support orders are entered. Secondly, seeing the lawyer may be looked upon as a household chore. And we know who does the majority of those.

I do wish to tell you that alimony is not given in about 90% of cases. And when it is most are limited. The exception is the super rich.
 
The laws in this country are very biased on both sides. Women suffer from laws that men benefit from and vice versa. But these divorce laws are clearly pro-woman and anti-men. However, they also costs OTHER women and children at the same time.

Just think, if a woman divorces her husband and he has to support her and the kids and he goes on in his life and marries another woman, then he'll have less money to support the new woman with and any future children he has with her. This hurts the new woman in his life just as much as him. This is an example of how feminism and pro-woman laws shoot themselves in the foot.

If they want women to gain, they will have to learn that they will have to share with men equally. Same things goes for men against women. We can not grow in this life without one another.

Edit:

Murph, I completely agree. The laws are very pro-woman and biased. The same goes for pro-choice and abortion laws that women benefit from and men don't. Western laws take all responsibility and fear away from women and put them all on the men. Of course men can choose not to have sex and choose not to get married, but it's not the same for women. The laws promote women to get married and to have sex without the fear of having to "lose" anything if it doesn't work out. If a woman doesn't want a child she can abort it. If a woman is unhappy with her marriage then she can walk out and the man will end up paying for it 9 times out of 10, even if she makes more money than him.

Feminism shoots itself in the foot though on everything. For every "pro-woman" issue they fight for they only hurt themselves down the road. By encouraging millions of women that it's ok to abort prenancy, they may be sending millions of these women to hell. That's debatable, but that's something that women who abort will just have to deal with when they die and meet their maker. I sure wouldn't want to have to deal with that and have guilt my whole life.

Just like lemmings are led to believe that jumping off a cliff is fun - there's a MAJOR consequence for doing the act.
 
Just because women *file* for divorce 75% of the time doesn't mean that the husband had no hand in it. She may be filing because he cheated on her or beat her.

Just as when a man leaves a woman, we do not presume that he's the one who was at fault in the relationship, we presume that maybe she did something to make him realize the relationship wasn't healthy for him.
 
Just because women *file* for divorce 75% of the time doesn't mean that the husband had no hand in it. She may be filing because he cheated on her or beat her.

Just as when a man leaves a woman, we do not presume that he's the one who was at fault in the relationship, we presume that maybe she did something to make him realize the relationship wasn't healthy for him.
 
Back
Top