I didn't spot that, but another bit that made me laugh (for the wrong reasons) was when there was a scene that cut to Ron, and he had a massive smile on his face.
I was thinking it was because he had his 'wicked way' with Lavender... but it just turned out to be a love potion that someone else had given him!! Must have just been my dirty mind working away...
I've just come back from seeing the film and, although I'm no big Harry Potter fan, I felt this one was a letdown on the whole film series.
There were a few sub-storylines and scene put in there that didn't need to be there; I hear some fans say that some - like the bridges exploding - it wasn't in the book either. Half the film was focused on the various romances of the main characters and I felt the prominent better scenes towarRAB the end were pretty sudden and 'done with' like
Dumbledore's death. No funeral, no ceremony, nothing. What happened to Snape and Draco because of this then?
There were also moments where items/creatures/graphics popped up out of nowhere - probably to make sure the audience were still awake as some moments were dragged out needlessly! Ok I'm being a bit sarcastic there and it was probably just me who felt that way.
Why did they call it 'the half blood prince' when the only reference to him was when Harry discovered his potion book, Hermonie [sic] asking if Harry want to know who it is and at the end when he revealed his true identity? I do love the scenes of London and towns of the 'ye olde world' exterior and cobbled roaRAB.
Yep that's true. But surely that doesn't stop them being mentioned. We know they haven't cast anyone for those roles but surely they will be mentioned otherwise it won't make much sense [[/QUOTE]