Well, despite the onslaught of crappy horror hollywood put out, there's been a few decent ones out in the past few years, and as long as the studios cough up some cash and get together a decent script, cast and director, the ninth one could bring halloween back on track.
I just hope they don't ruin it by trying to hard to make the ninth one something overly special or fancy. They tried to employ a gimick with the eighth one and look how that turned out. Halloween 6 and H20 were both decent films, and in my opinion, the best of the sequels. They went back to basics; small cast, simple story and linked them in with the origins of the movie. However, now Laurie, Loomis, Marion Chambers and Jamie are dead in the movie's universe, I think it'll be hard to really re-capture the essence of those successful sequels that worked because there was a protaginst the audience knew to some extent and cared for (especially the diehard Halloween fans). Although "John Tate/Strode" is a possible candidate to carry the franchise the on, I doubt any writer would include him. One; they're very unlikely to get Josh Harnett back, and I don't know whether they'd bother trying to recast the role and, Two: Chances are, they won't want to go for a male lead in a slahser film.
It's going to be interesting to see which direction they do choose to take with the ninth film.