What facts are those? Like I said UYI were classic albums too, just because you do not want to admit that does not make it so, also LZ had some really ****ty albums, but of coarse you would never admit that. If you really do not think that Civil war, Nov rain or estranged do not stack up with those songs you mentioned then you are a lost cause.
I am curious to how old you are? Because if you are around your 30s then you would know how huge guns n roses were in the early 90s.
Also guns n roses self-destructed yet their music still lives on in the year 2005, they are still on heavy rotation on modern rock stations and classic rock stations here in Boston. Plus, you go to any sporting event in the world, and you are going to here welcome to the jungle at least once. Also gnr were around for pretty much the same amount of time as nirvana, so what do you have to say to that?
And you still have not shown how LZs career was much bigger than
Gnrs. Like I said, show me when LZ played in front of 7m people during a three year span then you will have an argument, but like I said gnr were just as big if not bigger than LZ was in the 70s. Dont just say no I am wrong, prove it. The fact is, you wont prove it, because you cannot prove it.
You wanted to go on just album sales of LZ IV vs AFD, but I showed you half the amount of years AFD sold more than LZ IV did. So what do you want to try to prove next?
Fact is gnr is still very popular today, just look at their GHs album it was the 10th biggest seller in the world last year,, not too bad for a band that has not released any new album (of original material since 1991).
You have gotten your @$$ kicke this whole thread so you really need to stop before you look even worse.