E
elucidator
Guest
Not enough bongo.
Wow, that site uses an [i]amazing[/i] algorithm.I can't figure out if the style is more E.E. Cummings or William Carlos Williams.
Maybe someone should submit it to:
http://iwl.me
Your post is racist and incoherent. Pretty much the Teabaggers platform.
I would take you seriously....but I'm pretty sure taking you seriously would itself be off-topic for this thread.Answer the substance of my post FIRST - and then trash me, if you must.
I would take you seriously....but I'm pretty sure taking you seriously would itself be off-topic for this thread.Answer the substance of my post FIRST - and then trash me, if you must.
Well aren't you just the arbiter of coherency and 'Teabaggerness' ...
Can't you THINK?
Aren't you just wonkingly Superior?
(SNIP)
Is this sentiment so startling difficult to comprehend because my posts don't fit some acceptable criteria?
"To be hope-y change-y or not to be hope-y change-y, that is the gotcha question."
http://politicalhumor.about.com/b/2010/07/20/palin-compares-self-to-shakespeare-after-inventing-word-refudiate.htm
Lurking guest, let me spell it out for you (now that we're in the Pit):
You are a fucking lunatic.
GTFO.
And seek professional help.
I did submit it, and it comes back as Cory Doctorow.Wow, that site uses an [i]amazing[/i] algorithm.I can't figure out if the style is more E.E. Cummings or William Carlos Williams.
Maybe someone should submit it to:
http://iwl.me
Ohhh, shiver...aren't you just the arbiter of Truth, Justice and The American Way?
Well, I think you may be just the one to know what is "... a fucking lunatic..."
Can't you respond to a political question (search, dear heart) BEFORE you relish trashing the questioner?
Answer the substance of my post FIRST - and then trash me, if you must.
Well aren't you just the arbiter of coherency
Please tell us what substance you're on.Answer the substance of my post FIRST - and then trash me, if you must.