General opinion on Greatest Hits and Best Of compilations.

Kind of the same. If I hear a few bits and pieces of a band and like the sound of them I'd rather get a couple of their albums first or, at the very least, get on Spotify/Last FM etc rather than buy a greatest hits. I'm in complete agreement with Goblin Tears and his point about the Cure, there's no way you can judge the capacity of the Cure on their Greatest hits. The only thing I like about compilations is the b-sides/remixes/previously unreleased material etc.

Saying that... I have bought greatest hits from a few my favourite Artists (namely Bjork and The Cure :S) purely because it completes my 'hard copy' back catalogue of albums and makes the slightly OCD side of me smile seeing them there, all lined up in order of release... Ahem.
 
If i'm on the fence about aq band, I usually pick up a best-of. For example, I wasn't sure if I wanted to invest much time into Helmet. I picked up the best-of and I loved it. With Faith No More, I had loved the band for years but their Who Cares Alot? compilation had a whole CD of unreleased stuff.

Sometimes it's a matter of loving a band but it being nice to have all the greats in one place like The Doors, the Beatles, etc.
 
I'm not against them - it depenRAB on the band. Like with The Fall I have no idea how to tackle their discography and right now I'm not even interested in exploring much past 50,000 Fall Fans Can't Be Wrong
 
With some banRAB I feel like Greatest Hits and Best Of's are necessary. Some banRAB released really inconsistent albums and had only certain songs that were good. I know that most of the time GH and BoC's don't manage to list the best songs, but at times they manage to do it.

Some banRAB were extremely consistent and comps of this type aren't needed for you to get really good material.

I guess I'm just neutral on the topic, I would rather have the full lengths, but sometimes the comps are the best/only thing that you can manage.
 
Back
Top