How does it seem contradictory? I just didn't expect them to have his mouth move. Clearly that was incorporating the movie into the next animated projects. Thankfully, it isn't jarring (or annoying) as giving Inspector gadget a talking Gadget Mobile in future animated versions, just because someone wanted it in the movie. But it's not detracting. I said that is was the only thing I wasn't comfortable with, but even then It's no big deal.
I'm defending the CGI actually (if you read the post directly above mine when the poster said the CGI looks like crap). I'd rather them do a film ALL in CGI than partially live action with CGI characters. Among other thing, the cartoon animals can act like cartoon animals. Unlike the film where Garfield was the only one, and Odie was real.
Not once did I say anything against this film. I think that even the fact a couple characters look akward, and they made his lips move, it's not like it's ruining the film for me. I'm extatic that we're finally getting the first animated garfield work since G&F was canncelled after years on CBS. This really looks like it upholds the classic strips and special much better than the movie did.
I'm defending the CGI actually (if you read the post directly above mine when the poster said the CGI looks like crap). I'd rather them do a film ALL in CGI than partially live action with CGI characters. Among other thing, the cartoon animals can act like cartoon animals. Unlike the film where Garfield was the only one, and Odie was real.
Not once did I say anything against this film. I think that even the fact a couple characters look akward, and they made his lips move, it's not like it's ruining the film for me. I'm extatic that we're finally getting the first animated garfield work since G&F was canncelled after years on CBS. This really looks like it upholds the classic strips and special much better than the movie did.