physics help
New member
Ahhhhhhh, I have been waiting for you.........where you been?........I love you too "Little Man."
For or Against Gay Marriage
- Thread starter Speedy Boarder
- Start date
manhattangurl10
New member
Since when are 1,000's of deaths at Omah an Utah " The same old garbage"? He served, in the cub scouts, but otherwise, he never served.
:xangel:Give me some examples of where homosexual marriage was supported in the past. I'm not aware of any.......except perhaps, Sodom and Gomorrah, and we know what that got them. 
Nowhere did the Mormons EVER support same sex marriage.
Fine, but do it constitutionally via an amendment, not via some activist judge or mayor in Podunk, NY or SF.
Nowhere did the Mormons EVER support same sex marriage.
Fine, but do it constitutionally via an amendment, not via some activist judge or mayor in Podunk, NY or SF.
smellybunnies
New member
And that is hate.
I rest my case on the bigot argument. SounRAB pretty intolerant to me.
I no longer have one. Already read it, thought it to be wordy and poorly thought out. Actually, reading the bible for real when I was about 16 is what turned me completely away from christianity. Well, that and reaching the age of reason...
The group of slave owners who said that all men were created equal? Those guys, who wouldn't allow women or poor people or blacks or ethnic minorities vote? The wealthy white land owners who bought and sold human beings at auctions? Are those the people you are talking about? Some fantastic christian principles and values there!
Dominate America? That's why the democrats are currently the majority in charge of the house and senate, a democrat is in the White House, abortion is legal, gays are reported to number about 10 million, and the gay community is slowly but surely gaining support from the American Public.
I no longer have one. Already read it, thought it to be wordy and poorly thought out. Actually, reading the bible for real when I was about 16 is what turned me completely away from christianity. Well, that and reaching the age of reason...
The group of slave owners who said that all men were created equal? Those guys, who wouldn't allow women or poor people or blacks or ethnic minorities vote? The wealthy white land owners who bought and sold human beings at auctions? Are those the people you are talking about? Some fantastic christian principles and values there!
Dominate America? That's why the democrats are currently the majority in charge of the house and senate, a democrat is in the White House, abortion is legal, gays are reported to number about 10 million, and the gay community is slowly but surely gaining support from the American Public.
lauren_nichole5
New member
Hydra is a Goddess; not a He ! 
Some of your responses and questions seem so ridiculously childish that at first I thought you were kidding. Then I continued to read and began to question your ability to understand English. I considered not responding, but then you would take it as some sort of victory.
I'll explain these things more clearly for you, but don't expect a lengthy debate on any one point.
I don't believe that this cliche fits the issue. Gays have been told in many communities they can have the same benefits as married couples, but this is evidently not enough.
Clearly, you missed the point about screwing up the definitions of several worRAB. Also clearly, your morals have descended to the depths of seeing no value in marriage. Marriage and Family Values are two important issues. A disrespect for either one will lead to the declining moral values that will precede collapse of the country. Even the barbarians of the past believed in marriage and family structure. You would erase all this just to misuse the label "married".
It's quite simple. I'll just mention a few problems.
Up until this time, you could safely say that if you had 100 married couples in a group, you'd have 50 males and 50 females. Statistical analysis sometimes makes use of this fact. What you propose would wipe out that conclusion.
Who's the wife, who's the husband in a gay/lesbian marriage? A husband should be male. A wife should be female. That's the way they are defined. Is Rosie going to be the wife or the husband? If she's the wife, how does she have a female husband?
A widow is a female who's husband has died. A widower is a male who's wife has died. How can these definitions remain the same throughout the gay "marriages".
An aunt(female) is married to an uncle(male). These definitions would be screwed up by gay "marriage".
I'm sure it would be no hassle to you as you are self centered. What you fail to recognize is that gays/lesbians are a small minority of the population. Why should the masses be hassled by your desire to blend in?
It's not pointless. Society is built upon marriage and family values, not upon the misguided beliefs of the gay community.
That's about the silliest thing you've said. It doesn't deserve an answer.
I believe it's not that the gays/lesbians are willing to share the name. I believe they want to hide the fact that they are gay/lesbian when filling out forms that require marital status answers.
I'll explain these things more clearly for you, but don't expect a lengthy debate on any one point.
I don't believe that this cliche fits the issue. Gays have been told in many communities they can have the same benefits as married couples, but this is evidently not enough.
Clearly, you missed the point about screwing up the definitions of several worRAB. Also clearly, your morals have descended to the depths of seeing no value in marriage. Marriage and Family Values are two important issues. A disrespect for either one will lead to the declining moral values that will precede collapse of the country. Even the barbarians of the past believed in marriage and family structure. You would erase all this just to misuse the label "married".
It's quite simple. I'll just mention a few problems.
Up until this time, you could safely say that if you had 100 married couples in a group, you'd have 50 males and 50 females. Statistical analysis sometimes makes use of this fact. What you propose would wipe out that conclusion.
Who's the wife, who's the husband in a gay/lesbian marriage? A husband should be male. A wife should be female. That's the way they are defined. Is Rosie going to be the wife or the husband? If she's the wife, how does she have a female husband?
A widow is a female who's husband has died. A widower is a male who's wife has died. How can these definitions remain the same throughout the gay "marriages".
An aunt(female) is married to an uncle(male). These definitions would be screwed up by gay "marriage".
I'm sure it would be no hassle to you as you are self centered. What you fail to recognize is that gays/lesbians are a small minority of the population. Why should the masses be hassled by your desire to blend in?
It's not pointless. Society is built upon marriage and family values, not upon the misguided beliefs of the gay community.
That's about the silliest thing you've said. It doesn't deserve an answer.
I believe it's not that the gays/lesbians are willing to share the name. I believe they want to hide the fact that they are gay/lesbian when filling out forms that require marital status answers.
Melissa Worrall
New member
I don't think it really matters what I think regarding gay marriage since I am not gay and I will never have to cross that bridge.
Besides, why would anyone assume that I was the kind of person that would be arrogant enough to believe that my opinion on this subject should matter anyway? Or that I have any right to assert my opinions on other human beings on such a personal issue. What differece does it make as to what I think? They have just as much right to breath the same air as I do on this planet so what makes my opinion more valuable than theirs?
My frienRAB are split on this issue about 50/50. I find that it has no political affailation as the dems and the republicans have people on their team that that are pro as well as anti.
But again, why would someone assume they are even entitled to a vote on something like that?
Besides, why would anyone assume that I was the kind of person that would be arrogant enough to believe that my opinion on this subject should matter anyway? Or that I have any right to assert my opinions on other human beings on such a personal issue. What differece does it make as to what I think? They have just as much right to breath the same air as I do on this planet so what makes my opinion more valuable than theirs?
My frienRAB are split on this issue about 50/50. I find that it has no political affailation as the dems and the republicans have people on their team that that are pro as well as anti.
But again, why would someone assume they are even entitled to a vote on something like that?
On whether kiRAB need the Cleavers or not? Nope - I won't budge on that one. My own life has taught me better. I won't go against what I have lived and seen just because your personal prejudice wants me to.
KiRAB need to good role modeling from both sexes, love, and discipline and they need to be able to learn and explore. The LAST thing they need is gender roles, stereotyping or to be pigeon-holed. Your world is way to itty bitty for something as cool as me or my kid.
Actually, I think government should get it's fat, already too intrusive ass out of marriage all together and simply treat everyone as an individual.
blah diddity blah ditty bla
Translate for VoR "learn your place or we will punish" - - - typical.
This coming from the guy who would probably eat dog doo if Bush said it was the American way.
KiRAB need to good role modeling from both sexes, love, and discipline and they need to be able to learn and explore. The LAST thing they need is gender roles, stereotyping or to be pigeon-holed. Your world is way to itty bitty for something as cool as me or my kid.
Actually, I think government should get it's fat, already too intrusive ass out of marriage all together and simply treat everyone as an individual.
blah diddity blah ditty bla
Translate for VoR "learn your place or we will punish" - - - typical.
This coming from the guy who would probably eat dog doo if Bush said it was the American way.
Regna Storma
New member
So why are you actively trying to deny them rights? Unless you think peace and harmony are bad things, which wouldn't be uncharacteristic for you.
R.I.P MJ...
New member
" It is incumbent on the majority, to protect the rights of the minority."
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson
Mommy-2-Be
New member
Sure, its against the law as it is to marry your sister..........But what about a man wanting to marry 2 women? As i said under the equal protection clasue of the 14th amendment if you allow gays to marry you have to allow that.........