I agree, i'm just trying to stave off the contrasting opinions on the issue. It's humorous how everyone (meaning the haters) can supposedly guage how much "talent" an artist has and how they are just "wasting" it.
Dave Grohl is not an average musician. in my opinion, he is special. Kurt Cobain was a lyricist of the highest order, but lacked vocal talent. Dave Grohl has the whole package.
That is completely untrue. Its plain stupid to say there out there for the bucks. Is it not possible for a musician like Grohl to make that kind of music simply because its the kind he enjoys, and has a fun time playing and making? Does that automatically mean hes out there to just make cash.... i don't think so
I really like the Foo Fighters. Their songs are catchy, the music gets me pumped up, and the lyrics are fairly well written. I think all around they are pretty good.
I can see why someone would disagree that they are the best (I'm not saying they are THE best), but I don't understand why people think they suck so bad.
I dont completely understand how nirvana came up with the foo fighters... im having a bit of trouble making a connection.. could someone sum it up real quick