five to eight sentences, discuss ecological footprint and what is meant by

S

Sterling

New member
ecological overshoot. PLEASE HELP:(? Carrying capacity is the maximum number of people the earth can support indefinitely.

True
False

POINT VALUE: 5 points

Every action impacts the earth’s eco-system

True
False

POINT VALUE: 5 points

What are two ways carrying capacity can be reduced?

Destruction of the environment and overuse of the earth’s resources
Higher production of food and more efficient transportation of goods
Growing and eating only vegetables
Carpooling and conserving energy

POINT VALUE: 5 points

What is an ecological overshoot?

When humans overuse the internet
When humans overuse the amount of resources the earth can supply
When humans overuse their cars
When humans overuse their money

POINT VALUE: 5 points

Which renewable resource is not at risk?

Fisheries
Petroleum
Forest
Groundwater

POINT VALUE: 5 points

What are some of the results of the depletion of our natural assets?

Resources become unavailable
People are unable to make a proper living
Conflicts over resources emerge
All of the above

POINT VALUE: 5 points

Which is true of the Ecological Footprint?

It measures a person’s actual shoe size
It cannot be changed
It is a tool to use measure how many resources are used
Business and governments don’t need to pay attention to it

POINT VALUE: 5 points

In a well-developed paragraph of five to eight sentences, discuss ecological footprint and what is meant by ecological overshoot.


POINT VALUE: 15 point

In a well-developed paragraph of five to eight sentences, discuss the demonstration/experiment you performed in this lesson. In writing this paragraph, consider the following questions: What was the point? Do you think it was effective? What were some suggestions given by your audience to decrease their footprints?


POINT VALUE: 25 point

Pick 3 of the families from the PBS: World in the Balance: Material World. In a well developed 3 paragraph essay, compare and contrast the lifestyles of families. Be sure to use some of the demographic data provided to support your conclusions.
 
"Ecological overshoot" is a fraudulent concept put forward by Malthusian fascists who deny the creative and inventive powers of humanity because they adhere to the dogmas of the environmentalist/anti-humanist cult, which implicitly views human beings as nothing but mere apes (no doubt due, at least in part, to the bestial nature of the aforementioned eco-fascists).

"Ecological footprint" is an equally fraudulent concept, put forward by the same fascist genocidalists, to advance the lunatic notion that the earth has some unchanging ecological equilibrium that all human activity disrupts. The point of this is to brainwash impressionable students with a virulent hatred for humanity, human development, and technological and industrial progress by implanting the idea that all of these things are damaging to "mother earth."

Now, go do your own homework.
 
"Ecological overshoot" is a fraudulent concept put forward by Malthusian fascists who deny the creative and inventive powers of humanity because they adhere to the dogmas of the environmentalist/anti-humanist cult, which implicitly views human beings as nothing but mere apes (no doubt due, at least in part, to the bestial nature of the aforementioned eco-fascists).

"Ecological footprint" is an equally fraudulent concept, put forward by the same fascist genocidalists, to advance the lunatic notion that the earth has some unchanging ecological equilibrium that all human activity disrupts. The point of this is to brainwash impressionable students with a virulent hatred for humanity, human development, and technological and industrial progress by implanting the idea that all of these things are damaging to "mother earth."

Now, go do your own homework.
 
"Ecological overshoot" is a fraudulent concept put forward by Malthusian fascists who deny the creative and inventive powers of humanity because they adhere to the dogmas of the environmentalist/anti-humanist cult, which implicitly views human beings as nothing but mere apes (no doubt due, at least in part, to the bestial nature of the aforementioned eco-fascists).

"Ecological footprint" is an equally fraudulent concept, put forward by the same fascist genocidalists, to advance the lunatic notion that the earth has some unchanging ecological equilibrium that all human activity disrupts. The point of this is to brainwash impressionable students with a virulent hatred for humanity, human development, and technological and industrial progress by implanting the idea that all of these things are damaging to "mother earth."

Now, go do your own homework.
 
Back
Top