First the Democrats deregulate the financial services industry. It

arnold

New member
implodes. Now they want to reregulate it? Financial geniuses, the Democrats are not. First Frank, Clinton, Dodd and the rest of the dingleberries thought that the banks "discriminated" against women and minorities. So they deregulated them and forced them to give loans to people who couldn't afford them. Then the housing market implodes and destroys the economy, and now, suddenly, the Democrats have decided that regulations are good after all.

How stupid are these people?
 
1. Deregulation was the problem, and Clinton (plus every Republican president, and the Republican congress that wrote the deregulation laws Clinton signed) is partly to blame.

2. 86% of the sub-prime loans came from private lenders not subject to any government regulation on the matter. In other words, they were NOT "forced" to make such loans.

3. The sub-prime loans that did come from Fannie/Freddie actually had a much lower defaut rate precisely because of governement regulations mandating things like minimum down payments (standards that private unregulated lenders did not use).

4. The real problem was not sub-prime loans in any case, but rather the unregulated trade in derivitives, the unregulated sale of credit-default swap insurance (which killed AIG), and the unregulated ratings offered by private bond ratings agencies.


In all, Greenspan had it right when he said the collapse pointed to a fundemantal weakness in an unregulated free market. Such markets tend toward short-term gain at the cost of systemic long-term risk simply because executives have so much to gain and so little to lose.
 
i agree with steve 100%.

i'd also like to add that if you try something and see that it is not working or destructive it's good to assess what went wrong and fix it.
 
Back
Top