Films you wish there wasn't a sequel to

T3 has many flaws - but wishing it's removal doesn't take it's canonicity away. T4 directly sequels (is that a verb now?) the events of T3.
 
Pitch Black was a realy good film

Chronicles of Riddick, a piss poor attempt at either Lord of the Rings for Sci-fi fans or dune lite, so far up it's own rear end it was a bit difficult to fathom what the hell it was about.
 
The paradox of the Terminator saga is that John Connor and his mother attempt to prevent the future apocalypse.

By depicting these events T3 sets them in stone thereby negating the entire point of Cameron's films that the future is not essentially pre-determined.

From what I can gather T4 wisely side steps this gaffe & is set before John Connor senRAB Reese back so T3 can be retconned out of existence.
 
Some of them had their moments.

Plus the story arc was nicely circular in design.

They certainly have more right to exist than the likes of Highlander II or T3.
 
Actually it doesn't negate anything. It means that Sarah/John tried and failed, it doesn't mean that they couldn't have stopped it if they had done something different.
 
Yup. As I understand it, Sarah and John failed to stop Judgement Day, but they did delay it significantly by changing events.
 
Back
Top