...available for men? Here is an example, a female replying financial abortion idea :
"There are no double standards, because Men ALWAYS get the first choice. It's called the choice to WEAR A CONDOM. If they aren't responsible enough to make the right first choice, of course they should pay. Babies don't raise themselves.
"
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aq6.KQMamwbalkvvR6SLHQPSDH1G;_ylv=3?qid=20101028191452AAXSDDf
I would like to say, women got a choice before condom. Take the MORNING AFTER PILL, so when people talk about financial abortion why they talk about contraceptives as only available for men ?
So if a woman is not responsible enough to take the morning after pill then she should carry the fetus and give it birth.
Contraceptives available for women are more and better (Coil\Diaphragm\Morning-After Pill \Hysterectomy\ Female condom), so if they can be used to refute financial abortion idea then they ULTIMATELY refute the abortion idea itself. Any SENSIBLE answer ?
Gaia, how about facing the fact that condoms have more chance to fail that other contraceptives ? How about the fact that Vasectomy has 20% chance to fail making the man barren forever, yet this chance increases by time too ? How about the fact that women still have a chance opt out even upon the failure of contraceptives while men can NOT ?
True, same question is for you too.
Grape head, I did not say I am against abortion while men should be allowed not to pay
"There are no double standards, because Men ALWAYS get the first choice. It's called the choice to WEAR A CONDOM. If they aren't responsible enough to make the right first choice, of course they should pay. Babies don't raise themselves.
"http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aq6.KQMamwbalkvvR6SLHQPSDH1G;_ylv=3?qid=20101028191452AAXSDDf
I would like to say, women got a choice before condom. Take the MORNING AFTER PILL, so when people talk about financial abortion why they talk about contraceptives as only available for men ?
So if a woman is not responsible enough to take the morning after pill then she should carry the fetus and give it birth.
Contraceptives available for women are more and better (Coil\Diaphragm\Morning-After Pill \Hysterectomy\ Female condom), so if they can be used to refute financial abortion idea then they ULTIMATELY refute the abortion idea itself. Any SENSIBLE answer ?
Gaia, how about facing the fact that condoms have more chance to fail that other contraceptives ? How about the fact that Vasectomy has 20% chance to fail making the man barren forever, yet this chance increases by time too ? How about the fact that women still have a chance opt out even upon the failure of contraceptives while men can NOT ?
True, same question is for you too.
Grape head, I did not say I am against abortion while men should be allowed not to pay