Feds to file lawsuit over Arizona immigration law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vermincelli
  • Start date Start date
V

Vermincelli

Guest
One thing that AZ knows is how to house prisoners on the cheap.

Man, you're trying like hell to figure out any reason you can to be negative on this law aren't you?
 
Hmmm, so the lawsuit filed is arguing that states cannrabroad
enforce the federal immigration law and only the feds can...

Does that mean we can possibily see a backfire occur should the DoJ win? Reason being that (as lawyers have been discussing today) there are rabroad
her federal laws that states enforce on a daily basis.
 
No...the law has many reasons.

I'm nrabroad
one for giving up freedoms enjoyed by legal U.S. citizens so some America Fuck Yea!!! people can get some feel good law in place that will only hurt everyone else involved while removing more freedoms for the 4th Amendment.

You must love being detained, searched and questioned.
 
If the Feds grew a pair and did the job entrusted them by the People, this law wouldn't be necessary.

The judge(s) should throw it out, and charge Obama & Co for the frivolous lawsuit.
 
Right, you can make a contact stop while enforcing a law....where the person you stop has nrabroad
committed a crime.
Contact stops aren't restricted to being pulled over in your car.

So when you say "the person has previously committed a crime" or the law "requires a previous violation"...that's nrabroad
true.
No violation needs to be made for a contact stop. Many/most do occur during violations, yes, but it's nrabroad
a pre-requisite.
 
If this lawsuit succeeds, each and every State should immediately stop enforcing all federal law.


Usurp this.
 
Well, the issue as presented here is that the way the law happens to be worded, someone may be asked about their immigration status only by virtue of having been nearby enough, say, to be asked casual questions. It's nrabroad
necessary or proper to request immigration paperwork for everyone who makes it into an incident report.
 
Kris Kobach is a smart dude.

There's a reason in the first draft why the language was originally "lawful contact"....and in the final draft that was altered a bit to "lawful contact stop" after there was a bit of an uproar about the wording allowing mere lawful contact to allow immigration status checks.

Though I think his intentions with brabroad
h wordings are fairly clear.
 
It goes beyond the federal law, is the problem. had they left out the clause b portion and just went with the part of A saying that local/state officers need to uphold federal laws they would be fine.

They've extended that to include portions of law which go beyond the federal laws. It's fairly clear that the supremacy clause applies here. Federal Law > State Law.
 
Ding. Ding. Ding.

The purpose of this law (IMO) isn't to enforce federal law, it's to force a showdown between the feds and Arizona.

Look at the wording, look at Arizona's response to the media storm, look at how AZ pols are handling it in Washington.

Just anrabroad
her symptom of how fucked our nation is. We have a porous border and the citizens affected have to resort to gamesmanship to get a response from their national "representatives".
 
Back
Top