I need help answering this question, analyzing it, and also explaining it.
Given the development of the case, Anne Anderson would likely have been a class representative. Would Anne Anderson’s claims have been typical of the claims of the various classes required by Rule 23(a)(3)? Would she have adequately represented these classes, as required by Rule 23(a)(3)?
I would like to know what is Rule 23(a)(3) is in more detail. I know basically is one person represents a whole group whether they are suing or being sued.
Oh, most of all I forgot to add it is about "A Civil Action" known as Anderson v. Cryovac and Anderson v. Beatriz.
Given the development of the case, Anne Anderson would likely have been a class representative. Would Anne Anderson’s claims have been typical of the claims of the various classes required by Rule 23(a)(3)? Would she have adequately represented these classes, as required by Rule 23(a)(3)?
I would like to know what is Rule 23(a)(3) is in more detail. I know basically is one person represents a whole group whether they are suing or being sued.
Oh, most of all I forgot to add it is about "A Civil Action" known as Anderson v. Cryovac and Anderson v. Beatriz.