I agree with you. However, I'd like to point out I never suggested military security clearance background checks or building a "great wall" along the border.
I'm very interested in what your response would be to the second half of that post?
So...if it's against the constitution to secure our nation from illegal immigrants looking to take advantage of taxpayers...how is that not enforcing systematic looting of the American people?
Yeah that's where you fall back to when you have nothing else: the law "reeks" of racism, but you can't really explain why. You can't argue disparate impact until you see it in action and you can't argue racist legislative intent unless you also think states don't have a legitimate interest in maintaining the rule of law.
And I don't care about what the vocal group thinks. I have non-racist reasons for disliking illegal immigration and I'm plenty educated for everyone in this thread about constitutional law and economics if anyone actually has a good argument.
We obviously need immigrant labor. If we allow enough people to enter the country legally to fill that market, it's logical that we would have less people trying to cross illegally. Lowering the volume of illegal immigration would allow us to better prevent it.