Evidence that humans are to blame for global warming?

  • Thread starter Thread starter drickiter
  • Start date Start date
D

drickiter

Guest
Hiiii :)
please please help.
i'm doing a GCSE case study, and i need evidence of...

why humans are to blame for global warming AND an argument to show what the piece of evidence shows and how it proves it.

i will also have to do an argument of why we are NOT to blame.

please give me an argument, link to/ and the piece of evidence

10 points.

i'd owe you my life!!
:) thanks.
 
"i will also have to do an argument of why we are NOT to blame."

good grief! for gcse? is this set by your teacher or is it part of the national curriculum? outrageous!
or do you mean you have to give one example of a natural forcing? in which case, you could give 'milankovitch cycles', and the glaciation cycle within this ice age as proof.
 
You should read State of Fear! It has a lot of good information in it about global warming, plus it's a fun, good, easy read =P. Don't fall for the "un-asterix-ed" stuff though.

Seeing as Benjamin did such a good job talking about why global warming is caused by humans, I will tell you why it isn't ^.^ .

A. When I went to the website, I saw that it was actually only 0.7° C, which is just a little above 1° F, like I thought. However, Benjamin hasn't told everything; this temperature change is almost identical to the change over the past THOUSAND years, as shown at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png. Furthermore, as you can see, we just left the Little Ice Age, which means that we will be quickly warming up (by quickly, I mean about 1°C per hundred years). I wish the graph went back further because you would then see more sharp temperature increases.

B. Isn't it wonderful how forgetting the smallest details can make your argument so much stronger? Well, that's, again, what Benjamin did here. While it is true that Carbon Dioxide has increased by 35%, it is so minuscule that much less than 0.1% of our atmosphere is Carbon Dioxide. I got this evidence from http://www.planetforlife.com/gwarm/glob1000.html, and they seemed quite impartial, neither pro- nor con- global warming. Here's a quote I found: "It is possible to estimate the actual temperature increases and decreases that occurred in the past one thousand years. The MWP was 1°C or 2°C warmer than the average temperature of the millennium. The LIA was 1°C or 2°C colder. The current warm era is about 0.75°C warmer and thus not warmer than the MWP." I assume MWP is most warm period or something similar. So, there you have it: we are not abnormally warm and Carbon Dioxide makes up significantly less than one-thousandth of our atmosphere.

C. How egotistical is that!!! Not only has man never understood Earth and its environment (why it exists, how, and so on..), but now we're claiming to have altered a planet's ecosystem??? Well, sorry to disappoint you, but in the history of Earth, there has been an estimated FIFTY BILLION species. How do we not know that one of the currently existing FIFTY MILLION other species is doing this? We have no understanding of why we even exist! The most likely event is that this is GOOD for Earth; in fact, many prestigious scientists say that this will spur plant growth. Remember, we breathe in Oxygen and get rid of it. Believe it or not, Oxygen can be a very poisonous substance. If we look at it that way, isn't it the plants who are wrecking the planet? Or, wait, maybe it's the cows because they have to go to the bathroom -.- . We make up MUCH less than 0.000000000000000001% of the organisms on this planet. Furthermore, Mars is currently warming up. Is it because the Martians are polluting too much? Nope, didn't think so. This is because it is the NATURAL ORDER of things.

D. HAH!!! Let me guess... That's from The Union of Concerned Scientists or something like that? Well, I have looked over their website for at least an hour and a half, and I found not even one piece of evidence for global warming. Oh, of course there was the, "We have collected 30,000 distinguishable proof that global warming exists" and the "If you don't sign the Kyoto Thingy, Earth will die. We expect hurricanes to increase tenfold if we don't recycle by 2010." Among scientists, global warming is almost completely rejected now. It's just the politicians who will lie to your face and smile, the Hollywood stars who think they know everything because they know one outdated piece of science, and the media who will become much less watched if they start portraying global warming as untrue. People should worry about undisputed facts, like the children in Africa dying 15 times a minute and the cancer killing someone every 8 seconds (too many ads =P) before we start worrying about something that we couldn't change even if we want to.

E. IF, IF, IF, IF... Who says it will warm another 1.7°C??? This is the kind of research that makes me angry... NEWSFLASH! The Earth will NOT warm that much. Even if it does, it has been MUCH, MUCH warmer before. In fact, it has almost reached that temperature several times in the past 10,000 years. Oh, so if we don't recycle (which I do, by the way; don't get me wrong, I am VERY environmentally conscious), the glaciers will melt? That's odd because no one really knows if they're melting or not... I, for one, have stopped reading the news articles about it and solely gone to academia sites (don't go to environmental organizations; they're just business). If you do, you'll see that, for example, the Antarctic is actually EXPANDING. I searched Antarctic growth (or something like that), and the first result was this: http://jjprzy.envy.nu/images/AntarcticIceGraph.jpg. Notice how in the last years, it's well above even. Here's the temperatures down there: http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/FOS%20Essay/Antartica%20Temperature%201979-2006%20MSU.gif. See how it has gotten cooler? That means growth, not melting. As for Greenland's ice, that's only about 4% of the world's ice, and IT HAS BEEN MELTING FOR THE PAST THOUSANDS OF YEARS. Nothing new there...

F. This is all true. Finally, some untainted evidence! I commend you!!! This mentions nothing about humans causing global warming, though. I was actually going to put much of that in my "essay" =P.

G. Really, now? I must've missed the section proving that... Such a shame... I really would've loved to counter it. Here, I'll award you a point just for saying it =P. Yes, humans might be adding a little to the Carbon Dioxide, but as I've repeatedly shown you, Carbon Dioxide is less than 0.1% of our atmosphere, and human beings have barely contributed to any of that - if at all. Remember, the world is a vast, constantly changing place; for us to cause any lasting damage on it would be impossible. Even the results of a nuclear war would go away, given many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many years.

So, in conclusion, look for the truth in things. Don't fall for "We have many pieces of evidence". Find the evidence, find the credibility, find the graphs, find the work. If all else fails, move to the Scandinavian countries and watch the ice expand (of course, you could go to Antarctica too...). Enjoy life on Earth while you can, and focus on real problems that are killing millions of people each year. Fight poverty, injustice, disease, and most of all, truthlessness. The public deserves to know the truth about global warming, even if that truth isn't the one I believe. Good luck!

I hope this helps!
 
If I were you I would rebel a little bit, add a few arguments from the "climate change skeptics" as well as the science debunking their non-sense theories. You can find a lot of info here:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
or here http://www.realclimate.org/

Also, I hope you teacher doesn't have a hidden agenda with this project. Remember that there is an international consensus about Climate Change. That only few voices are still denying its existence.
 
Of course there's such a thing as global warming. Not only is global warming real, but mankind's activities contributed greatly to our recent warming.

A. Since the turn of the last century, the average global temperature has risen by about 0.8°C (about 1.4°F). Most of this increase has come within the last thirty years. http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.lrg.gif

B. CO2, methane, water vapor are all greenhouse gases. Over the last ~150 years, the concentration of CO2 has increased by 35%. More greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will means that Earth's surface will become warmer.

C. Most, if not all of this increase in CO2 is the fault of mankind. We know this because of changing ratios of carbon in the atmosphere.[1]

D. Due to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the average global temperature is expected to rise by another 1.1 to 6.4°C by 2100.[2] The most likely increase will be between 1.7 and 4.4°C.

E. If the world warms by another 1.7°C, then there is a laundry list of bad effects that will most likely come true. That laundry list includes: more evaporation, and heavier precipitation and severe storms. Heavy precipitation often leads to flooding. And because there is heavy precipitation in one area, the next area over will get less precipitation. This is because the storm clouds have already dropped much of the accumulated water vapor. Inland, droughts are expected to worsen. A 1.7°C increase hastens the melting of glaciers and snow pact. Much of the world receives their fresh water from glacier melt. With the glaciers gone, many people will have no drinking water for much of the year... etc. etc....

F. The climate can also change for a number of "natural" reasons as well. Such natural changes include:
1. Solar variations: This is thought to be responsible for the Medieval Warm Period and the little ice age. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png
2. Orbital variations: Orbital variations are though to be responsible for the coming and going of ice ages. http://www.technologyreview.com/articlefiles/climatechart.pdf
3. Plate tectonics: The movement of continents and the building and eroding of mountains have greatly changed the climate of earth over the course of millions and billions of years.
4. The chemical composition of the atmosphere affects climate as well. Most molecules in the atmosphere are immune to outgoing radiation (sunlight that bounces off of earth). The greenhouse gases trap this outgoing radiation close to the surface of earth.

Some particles such as dust and ash reflect sunlight before it even has the chance to warm Earth. Dust and ash from volcanoes and meteor impacts can cool off earth for years and even decades.

The evolution of single cell organisms, and then animals and plants, gradually changed the composition of the atmosphere over the course of billions of years.

G. The bottom line is that all natural cycles have been ruled out as to the cause of our recent global warming.
 
Their best evidence is they have no idea what else it could be. What they won't tell you is that they have no idea of the causes of countless other warming periods in earth's unfathomable history. Their making a judgement from a lack of understanding rather than by repeatable expermentation.
 
Back
Top