Equal Vote for every state debate! plz help!?

P

ProDiGy

New member
In my class, my Teacher divided us up into 2 groups.
1. A group who thinks bigger states should have more votes.
2. and the other which thinks every state should have 1 vote.

Its basically a debate, im in the first group.

can you guys give me some pointers, and questions to win this debate? any way to confuse them, and some questions they might ask, so we can be ahead of the game? thanks!
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
In a representative democracy it only makes sense to have more votes per state when that state has a greater population (this why larger states in the US get more electoral votes).
If each state only had the same fixed number of votes- that would no longer represent the people and population fairly.
 
Back
Top