Economists' outlook darkens: They see 30% chance of recession

[Chapo]

It just seems like a case of a little man thinking he can make a difference, then getting trapped in a place where he has little real power compared to what he and others think.

Yeah sure he can override a lot of things, but then people would start to look at you like a dictator and that shit wouldn't last long. The guy got fucked.

 

[Destiny K]

Murland

 

[amelia83]

Until some serious jobs get created, and I have no clue where they are going to come from this time around.

 

[bob123]

 

[LaneyW]

But but... they said the government could spend our way out of this!

 

[Bay.]

give us the non-book definition

 

[Lady]

.



I'm ready to see some change that I can believe in

 

[ppc422]

I got some bridges and swamp land to sell you.

 

[Crazykid 55]

government spending does in fact play a role in the GDP formula. but you are insane if you think we made up our lost GDP because of deficit spending.

and no, while i think BAC is undervalued at current levels. I am not a buyer here. If i had to have exposure in the large banks, id rather go with JPM.

 

[Alyx]

What's new and different about him? He's the culmination of the last 50 years of progressivism

 

[8 weeks pregnant with #1]

Consumers are justified in refusing to spend. Their lack of confidence is an appropriate response to the REALITY that their jobs are NOT secure.

 

[laced.lips]

jeezy called it years ago.

 

[liz v]

fuck, still better than Texas. shit is about to the fan down here.

 

[jamesrcdude14]

God help us.

 

[ShootinStarxx]

Fucking probabilities, how do they work?

 

[roofergirlusa]

There is a real, concrete definition...its the "book definition" you related in your previous post. And there is also a concrete answer to fix it, increased public sector spending...the problem is political obfuscation.

 

[XxApplePiiexX]

sigh

 

[illiniguy]

[No message]

 

[yussif]

but i am not a bank analyst.

 

[Bou Bou!]

ugh