Easy, opinion question - what should I focus my paper more on?

fancy_argonaut

New member
The title is Myasthenia Gravis Extra Muros: Building Social Constructs in a Media-Fueled Society

The paper is supposed to be about a specific disability. I chose Myasthenia Gravis and interviewed my dad for it.

So, I read a book called Disability & The Media, and tailored my paper to that with commentary by my dad and how his social life is impacted by his disease, and the role he THINKS media has played in this impact.

This is my format

Opening: General metaphor, disability with respect to media, then down to myasthenia gravis with respect to my dad.
Thesis: Therefore, it is undeniable that Myasthenia Gravis embodies the media-driven social implications of disability, as shown in the case of my father, *****.

First: Description of disease, since most people don't know what it is-familiarization
Second: Exactly what I explained above-what the paper is supposed to be about.

It's not 3 bodies since it's an exploratory paper!

But, in the paper I seem to be focusing more on disability rather than myasthenia gravis. I mean I have commentary from my dad, but I seem to be getting more information from books about just disability than him...is that ok?

Or should I change it to be more tailored to my dad? Basically dad or books haha. Which would u do?

Thanks
fml yahoo is frozen...ima have to do this myself then
 
Back
Top