You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
DYNO Numbers for Baggers???
- Thread starter Sniggs
- Start date
New here, so here are my mods and my numbers
09 Street Glide
SE high flow AC (29260-08)
SE211 Cams (25465-06)
Battistinis 2 into 2 Headpipe (05-200)
Rinehart 1.75 Slipons (1001-0100)
Power Commander V
Stage 2 ECM down load
85.94 HP
101.47 #'s
As stated in many of these posts there are Happy dyno's and numerous other factors that can give big or distorted numbers. My tune was done at Modesto Harley and the tech was surprised by the #'s due to stock compression and bore he said that most of the 103's with 10.5-1 and Rinehart True Duel set up with the 211's & SE AC were only about 5hp & 5#'s higher.
I hit 90#'s at 2000 rpm 95 at 2500 with a small dip to 89 at 2700 then it's a nice curve hitting a 100 from 3400 to 4200, 90 at 5000 80 at 5500 and 75 to the end at 6000. HP is 40 at 1800 hits 60 at 3000, 70 at 3600, 80 at 4100 levels off at 84 at 4800 and holds it to 5800 then dips to 81 at the end (6000)
I wanted to do the 103" but money is tight and this 96"set up pulls really good from 2800 on. I would have to say that the low end is better then stock but if your looking for a lot on the bottom end then 211's are probably not what your looking for without doing the 103" an higher Compression (10-1 or 10.5-1) the tech's at the stealer tell me that it will move the curve about 300 rpm to the left, for me I ride hard and it rides fine for me "And that's what counts more then numbers"
09 Street Glide
SE high flow AC (29260-08)
SE211 Cams (25465-06)
Battistinis 2 into 2 Headpipe (05-200)
Rinehart 1.75 Slipons (1001-0100)
Power Commander V
Stage 2 ECM down load
85.94 HP
101.47 #'s
As stated in many of these posts there are Happy dyno's and numerous other factors that can give big or distorted numbers. My tune was done at Modesto Harley and the tech was surprised by the #'s due to stock compression and bore he said that most of the 103's with 10.5-1 and Rinehart True Duel set up with the 211's & SE AC were only about 5hp & 5#'s higher.
I hit 90#'s at 2000 rpm 95 at 2500 with a small dip to 89 at 2700 then it's a nice curve hitting a 100 from 3400 to 4200, 90 at 5000 80 at 5500 and 75 to the end at 6000. HP is 40 at 1800 hits 60 at 3000, 70 at 3600, 80 at 4100 levels off at 84 at 4800 and holds it to 5800 then dips to 81 at the end (6000)
I wanted to do the 103" but money is tight and this 96"set up pulls really good from 2800 on. I would have to say that the low end is better then stock but if your looking for a lot on the bottom end then 211's are probably not what your looking for without doing the 103" an higher Compression (10-1 or 10.5-1) the tech's at the stealer tell me that it will move the curve about 300 rpm to the left, for me I ride hard and it rides fine for me "And that's what counts more then numbers"
pokeyprincess77
New member
Nice numbers. The cool thing is that when the budget allows, you can go with cast pistons (about $180) and cylinder bore (about $150) and you are OK on the cams.
B
B
09gliderider
I recently added some 211 cams to my 09 FLHT, along with boring my existing cylinders to 103 and 10.5:1 forged pistons. IMO a good combo if you like winding up the RPM's between gears. I also threw on a set of Thunderheaders. Love the way it sounds and runs. Plus it has a killer exhaust note at idle.
Kevin at Mitchell's HD will usually give you your dyno sheet in "uncorrected" numbers. But like you said earlier, they are only numbers.
I recently added some 211 cams to my 09 FLHT, along with boring my existing cylinders to 103 and 10.5:1 forged pistons. IMO a good combo if you like winding up the RPM's between gears. I also threw on a set of Thunderheaders. Love the way it sounds and runs. Plus it has a killer exhaust note at idle.
Kevin at Mitchell's HD will usually give you your dyno sheet in "uncorrected" numbers. But like you said earlier, they are only numbers.
adorethasp
New member
Ghost Rider,
I would like to see this bike ran with a good pipe. Even tho it is making 1.12 H.P. per C.I. I think you would get spanked on the street. I believe a D&D or a Guppy would get the Torque line up sooner and keep it level to 5250 RPM. Well that is my 2 cents for what it is worth. Don't take this wrong. I just think it can do better. Thanks, George
I would like to see this bike ran with a good pipe. Even tho it is making 1.12 H.P. per C.I. I think you would get spanked on the street. I believe a D&D or a Guppy would get the Torque line up sooner and keep it level to 5250 RPM. Well that is my 2 cents for what it is worth. Don't take this wrong. I just think it can do better. Thanks, George
tax cuts hurt the economy
New member
Dieber Built,
Ghost Rider was posting the info on my ride. I do not take you 2 cents wrong. I may even agree but still do not like the looks of a 2-into-1 pipe. For the riding I do this build will be more than enough for me (and is much better than most). Dave at JD's asked how I rode, where, when, why I wanted it, etc. He took into account my preference of a 2-into-2 and put together a build list based on this info and his experience. This produced an engine that is what I asked for and even better than I hoped for. I may someday get used to a 2-into-1 but until then this will melt the miles and bring me smiles
Ghost Rider was posting the info on my ride. I do not take you 2 cents wrong. I may even agree but still do not like the looks of a 2-into-1 pipe. For the riding I do this build will be more than enough for me (and is much better than most). Dave at JD's asked how I rode, where, when, why I wanted it, etc. He took into account my preference of a 2-into-2 and put together a build list based on this info and his experience. This produced an engine that is what I asked for and even better than I hoped for. I may someday get used to a 2-into-1 but until then this will melt the miles and bring me smiles
haytheredollface(:
New member
eglide,
You are correct, my sheet was printed with "Uncorrected" numbers.
I didn't realize that when I posted my numbers
I will ask for a "Corrected" sheet when they reopen and re-post my numbers, sorry for the miss information.
Would like to know what your numbers are to see if it would be worth doing the 103 & pistons or if I shoud just wait until I have the $ to do that along with the mild headwork I want to do and save the remapping cost.
Also did you put compression releases in (Auto or Manual)with the 10.5 compression you now have? The Deuce I traded in for this Street Glide had 11.2 compression and ate starters and batterys until I put them in, after that I had no problems. I know 11.2 is a lot more them 10.5 and that the Deuce motor was build on the edge - it dynoed "Corrected" at 107hp & 111#'s on Dream Rides (John) dyno also 105hp & 107#'s on the dyno at Reno H-D "Corrected"
You are correct, my sheet was printed with "Uncorrected" numbers.
I didn't realize that when I posted my numbers
I will ask for a "Corrected" sheet when they reopen and re-post my numbers, sorry for the miss information.
Would like to know what your numbers are to see if it would be worth doing the 103 & pistons or if I shoud just wait until I have the $ to do that along with the mild headwork I want to do and save the remapping cost.
Also did you put compression releases in (Auto or Manual)with the 10.5 compression you now have? The Deuce I traded in for this Street Glide had 11.2 compression and ate starters and batterys until I put them in, after that I had no problems. I know 11.2 is a lot more them 10.5 and that the Deuce motor was build on the edge - it dynoed "Corrected" at 107hp & 111#'s on Dream Rides (John) dyno also 105hp & 107#'s on the dyno at Reno H-D "Corrected"
Had 103 inch stage 2 installed at purchase, but was never really satisfied with it's performance. Just got my bike back from Cycle Rama with ported heads, D&D 2 into 1, valves, SE 58mm throttle body, SE injectors, new air filter, PCV and tune. Now she screams and LOVES to rev! HP at 120. TQ at 118.9.