riaphaelle
New member
http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgovernment/l/bl_party_division_2.htm
My mistake I glanced at the wrong column head. And what you said is either a flat out lie, or you just don't know what you're talking about. The reps controlled the Senate til 85 either way being ousted in 86 for Democrat control with the dems controlling the house for the decade.
So then the democrats supported his spending...which goes back to the talking point posted by hawkeye then reposted by EC trying to make Reagan look evil stating he ran 2 trillion in deficits. How is that incorrect?
Deficits that they helped create...since they controlled the house for all of the 80's.
If the real estate market had already begun to crash, then that is from policies from prior years of the Clinton administration leading back who knows how far. And again, for the rest of the Clinton administration, who you guys love to chant about running a surplus, the republicans controlled both houses.
So then there was Democrat support for it right? Since they controlled one half on Congress, in order to pass anything they had to vote and agree on it. Unless you're ready to say that the Republicans just sent things through one house and straight to the president.
The Healthcare bill has yet to even go into full effect so we won't even know how much that's going to cost us for quite some time. So we probably shouldn't jump the gun on saying the only debt increasing plan was the stimulus.
Still a moron. Dunno what you want me to say
The GOP at this point is not a part of conservatives. They spend on defense and security like the liberals spend on entitlements.
Oh, and there were Democrats STILL were in support of all those things.
230 billion....by 2021...meanwhile the actual cost of ACA hasn't even been remotely calculated since it hasn't even taken full effect yet.
Then you're incapable of reading.
My mistake I glanced at the wrong column head. And what you said is either a flat out lie, or you just don't know what you're talking about. The reps controlled the Senate til 85 either way being ousted in 86 for Democrat control with the dems controlling the house for the decade.
So then the democrats supported his spending...which goes back to the talking point posted by hawkeye then reposted by EC trying to make Reagan look evil stating he ran 2 trillion in deficits. How is that incorrect?
Deficits that they helped create...since they controlled the house for all of the 80's.
If the real estate market had already begun to crash, then that is from policies from prior years of the Clinton administration leading back who knows how far. And again, for the rest of the Clinton administration, who you guys love to chant about running a surplus, the republicans controlled both houses.
So then there was Democrat support for it right? Since they controlled one half on Congress, in order to pass anything they had to vote and agree on it. Unless you're ready to say that the Republicans just sent things through one house and straight to the president.
The Healthcare bill has yet to even go into full effect so we won't even know how much that's going to cost us for quite some time. So we probably shouldn't jump the gun on saying the only debt increasing plan was the stimulus.
Still a moron. Dunno what you want me to say
The GOP at this point is not a part of conservatives. They spend on defense and security like the liberals spend on entitlements.
Oh, and there were Democrats STILL were in support of all those things.
230 billion....by 2021...meanwhile the actual cost of ACA hasn't even been remotely calculated since it hasn't even taken full effect yet.
Then you're incapable of reading.