J
Jack in the Box
Guest
Should Bush be prosecuted for: Aggressive war against peaceful people, violation of several provisions of the Geneva Convention about war prisoners?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Don't you find Guantanamo detention camp, similar to Auschwitz?
L
LOJunkie
Guest
I don't think Gitmo is on par with the Holocaust, but Bush should definitely be charged with war crimes nonetheless.
S
Sasha
Guest
Another whiny f***ing Liberal. Bush kept your ass safe from another attack. You should be put in Guantanamo. You are a traitor with a traitor idea. Please do us a favor and don't join the military.
L
lsuitln18
Guest
Jews were persecuted bc of their religion... Most prisoners in GB are there bc they are criminals. I say most bc every jail has it's innocent, right
C
Condor
Guest
Yes, Absolutely. I also found George Bush similar to Adolf Hitler with one exception that Hitler indeed had brains.
Without any doubt criminal Bush must be prosecuted for all domestic crimes and crimes against humanity.
Without any doubt criminal Bush must be prosecuted for all domestic crimes and crimes against humanity.
S
Suave
Guest
The prisoners are allowed to pray. They are not starved. They take showers, not gas bathes. They are not being used as science experiments. I think they get much better treatment than those poor people who were sent to Auschwitz.
C
Charles C
Guest
No. No gas chambers, no forced labor. Good medical care.
Those being held are not subject to the Geneva convention accords. They are not members of any nations military.
Those being held are not subject to the Geneva convention accords. They are not members of any nations military.
D
DW2020
Guest
Not in the sheer scale of the cultual genocide represented by Auschwitz, no.
D
dnafairy
Guest
What do those Cubans think of those smoke stacks raining down human ashes?
Oh there are no smoke stacks? Then it's nothing like Auschwitz.
Oh there are no smoke stacks? Then it's nothing like Auschwitz.
C
Christine B
Guest
Not even close. All war is aggressive and Saddam was not peaceful.
J
Johnny Sokko
Guest
Not at all because I read.
Uninformed people might think so, though.
Uninformed people might think so, though.
I
Islam Delenda Est
Guest
Are you serious?!? I think you're a few million murders off on that comparison...especially considering there have been ZERO deaths at Gitmo.
C
Charles M
Guest
Number 1 - Peaceful people - a lot of these people were were terrorists that were intent on destroying the US.
Number 2 - Auschwitz - either one you don't acknowledge the holocaust or you are trying to piss off a lot of people. We do not gas and kill people at GITMO. The people that are there are allowed to pray, we feed them culturally specific food, and have proper healthcare. Most have gained weight since being there - No comparison.
Number 3 - The Geneva conventions only apply to signatory nations - Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq and others are not signatories.
Your statement at best is intellectual dishonesty, at worst a flat lie.
Number 2 - Auschwitz - either one you don't acknowledge the holocaust or you are trying to piss off a lot of people. We do not gas and kill people at GITMO. The people that are there are allowed to pray, we feed them culturally specific food, and have proper healthcare. Most have gained weight since being there - No comparison.
Number 3 - The Geneva conventions only apply to signatory nations - Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq and others are not signatories.
Your statement at best is intellectual dishonesty, at worst a flat lie.
J
joebob
Guest
No and you would have to be mentally deluded to draw that kind of conclusion.