Thank fuck for sweeping generalisations.
Where would we be without them.
Communist France, that's where.
does religion really represent god?
- Thread starter Ted Garrad
- Start date
Thank fuck for sweeping generalisations.
Where would we be without them.
Communist France, that's where.
that's a thumb down for you, sir:snooty:
luv_2_homeschool
New member
Well, hopefully not for the next couple of hours because I've got the dinner on.
justlilolme
New member
callum and colin aren't that far from each other, like. Especially when you've nevar met anyone named either 
funky fresh man
New member
/fixed
Why no take it all the way, like.
Oh and *Generalisations, ryan. He's not some colonial :ghey:
bummedlover
New member
My stance on the whurle subject:
believe what you want or do something else.
Ewe ignorant uneducated people who believe otherwise are all morans.
believe what you want or do something else.
Ewe ignorant uneducated people who believe otherwise are all morans.
light headed
New member
And you think that Christians should control the Holy land ?
Religion doesn't deserve respect and tolerance.
Do you respect the extremists that are killing innocent people in vain? Do you tolerate their beliefs?
Religion has negative and positive effects.
The positive effects that it has can be accomplished with far more peaceful methods.
What is the point of religion?
They're not still in 4 competitions, they've already won the CIS Cup. So up yours, hunboy.
I'm not sure it's possible to keep the cause of all trouble out of any argument
I always got you mixed up with azzz.
All the best people are doing it? What a joke. Do you define Mr. Blair as one of the best people?
Show me where I said that only the ignorant and uneducated are religious. I simply implied that many of them are, and it's true.
Why are you twisting my words? Why wont you reply to all of my comments and not just the ones you want to reply to?
You don't agree that religion can be used to relate to the people, and thus win popularity contests?
You don't agree that religion has killed millions of people, and has no positive purpose that can't be accomplished without it?
You don't agree that governments use, or at the very least have used religion as a way to control people?
You're welcome to cease your discussion with me, but I hope you'll bless me with your response.
.!.!.!.!.!.!
New member
see what I did there?:smilie4:
I'm sorry, I shouldn't be so negative.
I'll keep my opinion to myself, as it offends some people.
Generalizations*
lost and alone
New member
Oh and in response to the threadstarter I'd just like to say: WTF, brick of words.
Oh and there's no constant except that not everything can be proven or disproven at this point in time, when it comes to matters of the metaphysical.
Some organised religions can be, and have been, very bad things throughout history in some places. But not all of the concepts they embrace are inherently bad. It might even be argued that some have provided the means to create better civilisations, up to a point, as they lay down the law and motivate people to behave and conform to that civilisation's ideals with a better afterlife or some seriously nasty punishment from whoever's running the show, really.
Right now, maybe a lot of people need to rely less on organisation and more on introspection, what they think and not what's ordained, and for that matter let their children decide on what to believe themselves.
But if people want to be religious, and they neither hurt anyone, nor force their beliefs on anyone, I don't really see what the big deal is.
Let them have religion or something else.
Oh and there's no constant except that not everything can be proven or disproven at this point in time, when it comes to matters of the metaphysical.
Some organised religions can be, and have been, very bad things throughout history in some places. But not all of the concepts they embrace are inherently bad. It might even be argued that some have provided the means to create better civilisations, up to a point, as they lay down the law and motivate people to behave and conform to that civilisation's ideals with a better afterlife or some seriously nasty punishment from whoever's running the show, really.
Right now, maybe a lot of people need to rely less on organisation and more on introspection, what they think and not what's ordained, and for that matter let their children decide on what to believe themselves.
But if people want to be religious, and they neither hurt anyone, nor force their beliefs on anyone, I don't really see what the big deal is.
Let them have religion or something else.
ijoinedyou
New member
No, please express your opinions.
If you really believe that religious people "just can't live in reality, they want some kind of fictional sense of being. These people are weak." then say it.
There are billions in the World, it's good to see you can define them all so succinctly.
If you really believe that religious people "just can't live in reality, they want some kind of fictional sense of being. These people are weak." then say it.
There are billions in the World, it's good to see you can define them all so succinctly.
And it says in your belief system that holy wars cannot be fought through dinner time does it :lol:
Read the posts, idiot. I didn't ask anyone to respect God or religion. I specifically said that was a matter for the individual and was down to beliefs, to each their own. Why would I ask anyone to respect God if they don't believe She exists, or by extension religion which would then be in relation to something which doesn't exist.