Do you think there can ever be a circumstance where phortoes of naked children 12 to

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aussie_Icon
  • Start date Start date
A

Aussie_Icon

Guest
13 years old could ever? be considered "Art".

Police in Australia have closed down a gallery and will lay charges against various individuals including the photographer for displaying these nude photos of tweenies (girls).

The photos were taken with the parents consent.

Frankly I think they are all sick and twisted pond scum...especially the parents and the gross bastardsss that went to view the exhibition. . what is your view?
 
Kids are kids thats why we have appropriate ages for all types of activities ie. drinking, driving, etc. Children are beautiful but not at all sexual!!
 
This same question was asked yesterday.

I agree with your assessment of the parents and the photographer.

Had the photographer posted the pictures on the Internet he would have been called a pedophile. By displaying them in a so-called "art gallery" he was attempting to hide his own latent pedophilia. Fortunately, his clever ploy failed and he and the "parents" of these children have been exposed as the child exploiters they are.
 
Definintly viewed as erotica and NOT art. Personally I think its sick people find pleasure in it, but for kids to walk around without shirts, (Young kids 2-6) its not uncommon.
 
Back
Top